Chaminade High School - West Hills, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 17% |
2 | FLANAGAN Miles | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
3 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 14% | |
3 | MCCARVILL Cooper | 100% | 94% | 64% | 23% | 4% | < 1% | - |
5 | HERMAN Max | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 21% | 2% |
6 | TURNER Finian | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | < 1% | - |
7 | CHARETTE Matthew | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
8 | DEGANTE Johan | 100% | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
9 | TRAN Matthew | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 2% | < 1% |
10 | BRADY Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
11 | TRUJILLO Jonah | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
12 | CHARETTE Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% |
13 | BELTRANSOLORZANO Jared | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
14 | LAPP Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
15 | SONDHI Aekagra | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - | |
16 | COLLIGAN Apollo | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | |
17 | ROSE Jacob W. | 100% | 98% | 70% | 24% | 3% | < 1% | |
18 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | |
19 | MARQUEZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% |
20 | ISMAGILOV Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 20% |
21 | PONTOPPIDAN Erik | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% | |
22 | WOO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | 28% | |
23 | HUNTINGTON Charles | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
24 | DACKO Nolan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
25 | PETRAITIS Matteus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 31% |
26 | SHADRAVAN Arash | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
27 | CROUTCH Justin | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
28 | ZHANG Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
29 | YOUNG Luke | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
30 | KNIGHT Rollan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
31 | MARTINEZ Jorge | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% |
32 | ROY Barnabe | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 20% | 2% |
33 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 15% | |
34 | GONZALEZ Elias | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
35 | GRACZYK James | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
36 | VARIDIREDDY Suhan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
37 | LEVINE Reed | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 23% | 2% | |
38 | FURBERG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
39 | JONES Rodney | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
40 | ZAPATA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
41 | COREAS Aaron | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | CAMP Ryder | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
43 | DIAZ Zahir | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
44 | BRISTING Matthew | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | |
45 | FLORES Bernardo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 8% | |
46 | RAWLINSON Cameron | 100% | 86% | 49% | 14% | 1% | - | |
47 | KANT Jasper | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
48 | BOYAPATI Pranav | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
48 | MILNE Lennox | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
50 | TORRES A Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% |
51 | MURPHY Parker | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
52 | BIHLMEIER Gavin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
53 | ESQUIVEL SOLIS Matthew | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
54 | HERNANDEZ Ramon | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
55 | KATAN Miro | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
56 | GREENBURG Jackson | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
57 | SAUTER Luke | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
58 | STASHWICK Tilly | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
59 | BISSADA Matthew | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
60 | ARIAS CALIX Franklin | 100% | 99% | 83% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.