Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | YOOK Isaac | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
2 | VALENCIA Jose | V V V V V | V V V V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
3 | ZHANG Kaixuan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
3 | LIN Grant | V V V V V D | V V V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
5 | SUN Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
6 | ZHAO Royce | D V V V V D | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
7 | DAI Zihou | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
8 | SLAVNOV Anton | D D V D D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
9 | OH Aster | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | WEI Rian | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
11 | GORDON Samuel | D V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
12 | LIU Marvin | V D V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
13 | SADHU Neiyam | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
14 | KHANNA Adamantis | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
15 | WONG Ron | D D V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
16 | CHANG Ethan | V D D V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
17 | LAU Kyrus | V V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 6 | +3.0 |
18 | RINALDI Savio | V V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
19 | AGARWAAL Yohan | V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
20 | AVERY Marcus | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
21 | DOSTAL Maximilian | V V V D V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
22 | CAI fungyu | D V V V V V | V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
23 | NGO Emerson | V D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
24 | KOZLOV Lucas | V V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
25 | BADMUS Joshua | V V D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
26 | FENG Brendan | V D V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
27 | JI Johnson | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
28 | WANG Theodore | V D V D V V | V D | 1.5 | 4 | +2.5 |
29 | ROH Jaden | V V D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
30 | SRIVATS Vedh | D V V D V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
31 | TRZEPLA Max | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
32 | KOREN George | D V V D D | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
33 | AO Christopher | V V V V V V | D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
34 | WONG Max | V V V V D V | D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
35 | YUEN Caleb | V V D V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
36 | CHANG Timothy | D V V V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
36 | WELSTEAD Nicholas | V V D V V | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
38 | CAI Jeff | V V D V V D | D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
39 | LIANG Morgan | V V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
40 | LIU ERIC | D V D V V V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
41 | PAUL Jimmy | D D V V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
42 | SAYAR Luke | V D V D V V | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
43 | O’LOUGHLIN Jacob | V D V V D V | V D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
44 | MIAO Heqi | V V V D D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
45 | LIN Brendan | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
46 | TASIKAS Peter | V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
47 | SONG Aidan | V V D V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
48 | KOSMIN Ivan | D V V V D | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
49 | WONG Reagan | D V V V D D | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
50 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | V D D D V V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
51 | MELE Gianni | V D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
52 | SUH Leo | V V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
53 | WANG Edward | V V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
54 | OREN Daniel | D D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
55 | HAO Johnny | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
56 | ISAYENKO Daniel | D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
57 | LOO Jason | D V D V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
57 | LEMERY Marc | D D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
59 | SINGH Sumair | D V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
60 | HENDERSON Louis | D D D D V V | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
61 | D'AMELJ Edoardo | D D V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
62 | CHEN Felix | V D V D D D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
63 | DATTILIO Aidan | D D V D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
64 | CHEN Leo | D D D D D V | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
65 | ZHANG Simon | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
66 | WONG Mac | V D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
67 | WANG ARAN | D D V D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
68 | KOREN David | V D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
69 | VIDREVICH David | V V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | BEAL Colton | D V D V D D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
71 | YANG LOUIS | D D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
72 | LEVY Daniel | D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
73 | BURENKOV Matthew | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
73 | ZALETAEV Jacob | D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
75 | CHAVAN Aditya | D D D V D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
75 | LEIGH Brayden | V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
75 | HATCH Oliver | V D D D D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
78 | RIVERATAN Darshan | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
79 | DAI Ethan | D D D D D V | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
80 | MAKLIN David | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
81 | HEIMOV Brennan | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
82 | LEE Shane Gunn | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
83 | FILMORE Samuel | D D V D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
84 | SUN Stephen | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
85 | SHAPIRO Simon | D D D D D D | D | 3.8 | 0 | -3.8 |
86 | CHEN Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
87 | LI kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
88 | PARK Sean | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
89 | LI Jayden | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
90 | PARK Layne | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
91 | SMITH Jackson | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
92 | LI Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
93 | HUANG Lucas | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.