Ben Gutenberg SYC - RJCC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Saturday, October 12, 2024 at 2:00 PM

Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YOOK Isaac - - 1% 6% 24% 44% 25%
2 VALENCIA Jose - 2% 14% 36% 36% 12%
3 ZHANG Kaixuan - - 1% 5% 21% 42% 31%
3 LIN Grant - - - 1% 11% 40% 49%
5 SUN Andrew - - - 2% 14% 41% 43%
6 ZHAO Royce - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
7 DAI Zihou - - 3% 15% 34% 37% 11%
8 SLAVNOV Anton 1% 6% 21% 35% 29% 9%
9 OH Aster - - - - 5% 35% 60%
10 WEI Rian - - 2% 9% 27% 39% 23%
11 GORDON Samuel 1% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
12 LIU Marvin - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
13 SADHU Neiyam - - 3% 13% 30% 37% 17%
14 KHANNA Adamantis - - 1% 5% 23% 45% 27%
15 WONG Ron - 2% 12% 30% 34% 18% 3%
16 CHANG Ethan - 5% 20% 35% 29% 11% 2%
17 LAU Kyrus 1% 8% 23% 33% 24% 9% 1%
18 RINALDI Savio - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
19 AGARWAAL Yohan - 7% 25% 37% 24% 6%
20 AVERY Marcus 1% 12% 32% 35% 17% 3%
21 DOSTAL Maximilian 1% 7% 25% 36% 24% 7% 1%
22 CAI fungyu - 6% 25% 39% 24% 5% -
23 NGO Emerson 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 7%
24 KOZLOV Lucas - - - 4% 25% 53% 18%
25 BADMUS Joshua - 2% 10% 26% 34% 22% 6%
26 FENG Brendan - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 6%
27 JI Johnson - 1% 6% 21% 36% 29% 8%
28 WANG Theodore 16% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
29 ROH Jaden - 4% 18% 37% 32% 8% -
30 SRIVATS Vedh - 1% 8% 28% 42% 21%
31 TRZEPLA Max - 4% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
32 KOREN George - 5% 22% 37% 28% 8%
33 AO Christopher - - 2% 10% 29% 39% 21%
34 WONG Max - 1% 11% 35% 40% 12% 1%
35 YUEN Caleb - 2% 13% 32% 37% 15%
36 CHANG Timothy 4% 19% 34% 29% 12% 2%
36 WELSTEAD Nicholas - 1% 10% 30% 39% 19%
38 CAI Jeff - - 1% 6% 29% 49% 15%
39 LIANG Morgan 2% 14% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
40 LIU ERIC - 4% 25% 41% 24% 6% -
41 PAUL Jimmy 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
42 SAYAR Luke 9% 28% 34% 21% 7% 1% -
43 O’LOUGHLIN Jacob 7% 27% 37% 23% 6% - -
44 MIAO Heqi 3% 18% 39% 29% 9% 1%
45 LIN Brendan - 3% 15% 34% 35% 13%
46 TASIKAS Peter 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
47 SONG Aidan 1% 10% 29% 36% 20% 4%
48 KOSMIN Ivan 12% 32% 34% 17% 4% -
49 WONG Reagan 1% 7% 25% 35% 23% 7% 1%
50 LIM JUWANA Maximilian - 6% 27% 39% 22% 5% -
51 MELE Gianni 15% 35% 32% 14% 3% - -
52 SUH Leo 1% 11% 31% 34% 18% 4% -
53 WANG Edward - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
54 OREN Daniel 6% 23% 36% 26% 8% 1%
55 HAO Johnny 1% 10% 29% 37% 20% 4%
56 ISAYENKO Daniel - 3% 15% 37% 34% 11%
57 LOO Jason - 4% 17% 32% 31% 14% 2%
57 LEMERY Marc 1% 9% 26% 35% 22% 6% -
59 SINGH Sumair 5% 22% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
60 HENDERSON Louis - 4% 16% 31% 31% 15% 3%
61 D'AMELJ Edoardo - 6% 31% 41% 19% 3% -
62 CHEN Felix - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 3%
63 DATTILIO Aidan 14% 36% 34% 14% 2% - -
64 CHEN Leo 4% 18% 34% 29% 12% 2% -
65 ZHANG Simon 14% 34% 33% 15% 3% - -
66 WONG Mac 10% 29% 35% 20% 6% 1%
67 WANG ARAN 1% 5% 19% 33% 29% 12% 2%
68 KOREN David 12% 39% 34% 13% 2% - -
69 VIDREVICH David 4% 26% 39% 23% 6% 1% -
70 BEAL Colton - 1% 8% 24% 35% 25% 7%
71 YANG LOUIS 8% 29% 36% 20% 6% 1% -
72 LEVY Daniel 2% 19% 37% 29% 11% 1%
73 BURENKOV Matthew 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
73 ZALETAEV Jacob 7% 25% 35% 24% 8% 1%
75 CHAVAN Aditya 16% 43% 31% 9% 1% -
75 LEIGH Brayden 38% 43% 16% 2% - -
75 HATCH Oliver 48% 39% 12% 2% - -
78 RIVERATAN Darshan 7% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
79 DAI Ethan 45% 45% 9% 1% - - -
80 MAKLIN David 5% 22% 37% 27% 8% 1% -
81 HEIMOV Brennan 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
82 LEE Shane Gunn 4% 18% 32% 29% 14% 3% -
83 FILMORE Samuel 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 3% -
84 SUN Stephen 6% 30% 38% 20% 5% -
85 SHAPIRO Simon < 1% 1% 10% 28% 37% 21% 4%
86 CHEN Brian 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
87 LI kevin 10% 31% 36% 19% 4% - -
88 PARK Sean 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
89 LI Jayden 61% 32% 6% 1% - -
90 PARK Layne 14% 35% 32% 15% 3% - -
91 SMITH Jackson 41% 41% 15% 3% - - -
92 LI Lucas 31% 52% 15% 2% - - -
93 HUANG Lucas 54% 37% 8% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.