Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | OSOLINIEC Victor E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 33% |
2 | KOLASA Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | |
3 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
3 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
5 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% | 16% |
6 | RIVERA Inigo Franco | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
7 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
8 | LIN John A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 10% |
9 | DENNER Lysander H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
10 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
11 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
12 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
13 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
14 | WUN William | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
14 | KIM Avery J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
16 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
17 | HONG Marshall Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 7% |
18 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
19 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
20 | CHOU Stephen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
21 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
22 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
23 | LO Joshua H. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
24 | HUAYTA James W. | 100% | 92% | 56% | 17% | 2% | - | |
25 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 2% | |
26 | LILOV Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
27 | LUO ZiRui | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
28 | RAI Avin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
29 | YAO Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% |
30 | MORREALE John | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
31 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
32 | TANG Albert | 100% | 98% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 8% |
34 | KAUFMAN Bradley A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 16% | 2% | |
35 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 24% | |
36 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
37 | PEDERSEN Leif | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
38 | LIN William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% |
39 | QIU Le | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
40 | KAHN Justin M. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
41 | HENNICKE Michael G. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% | 1% | |
42 | XU Michael | 100% | 99% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
43 | HUDDY Brandon J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 4% | - |
44 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 94% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
46 | JUN Ryan | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
47 | CHAN Daniel | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 88% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
49 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 64% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
50 | METTKE Nathaniel | 100% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 3% | - | |
51 | DEWEY Charles J. | 100% | 75% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
52 | MORRIS Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
54 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
56 | HEREFORD Ramses D. | 100% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.