Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 50% | 14% |
| 2 | ZHOU Ryan | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 3 | LAM Nicolas | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
| 3 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
| 5 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 6 | MANIKTALA Suvir | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | CHAN Joseph | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 36% | 7% |
| 8 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 9 | LIU William | - | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 61% |
| 10 | ONG Nicholas | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 11 | KANG Anthony | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% | |
| 12 | PARK William | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 10% |
| 13 | GORDON William L. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 14 | ZHAN Kevin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 15 | WONG Braxton | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 16 | DUNLAP Ezra | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 17 | LEHTINEN Axel | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 18 | LUK Trusten | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 19 | KULKARNI Karan | 1% | 15% | 43% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | WEI Winston | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | UPENDER West | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 36% | 9% |
| 21 | LO Ernest | 14% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | BHANOT Arjun | - | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 24 | HUANG Nathan | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 25 | LEE Abin | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 26 | PARK Andrew | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 27 | XIE Yimo | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | MARTIN Lucas | 1% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | PETROV Mikhail | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 28% | 3% | |
| 30 | RAFFERTY-FUENTES Patrick | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BURAGOHAIN Aiden | 2% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 32 | NISHIHIRA Tyler | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 33 | YE Jerry | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 34 | ZHANG Jayden | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - | |
| 35 | LIU Aaron | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | AGARWAL Savya | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | SAFTA Aidan | - | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | HE Ian | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | GANAPATHI Eshan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 40 | GUO Joey | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | ANDRADE Cedric | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | ZHANG Andrew | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | BOYNTON Alex | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | REID Wesley | 12% | 43% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | HERNANDEZ Jonathan | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 4% | - |
| 46 | SILVEIRA Jorgen | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | BHARDWAJ Ranbir | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 48 | CHENG Maxwell | 28% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 49 | DACKO Nolan | 6% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | KIM Charlie | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 50 | HE Bourne | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 50 | GILMARTIN Colin | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | - |
| 53 | PEZESHKI Oliver | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
| 54 | YEE Colin | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 55 | LEE Linus | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | WILLIAMS Matthew | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | - | - | |
| 57 | VALLADAO Derek | 47% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LEONG Wilson Hua | 46% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 59 | TEJAKUSUMA Eric | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | CRIDLAND Trent | 71% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | VALLADAO Balian | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | VIZCARRA Nate | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.