Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | JONES LONGENBACH Melanie | V V V V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 3 | XU Christine | V V V D V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 3 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | V V D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 5 | MING YUE | V V V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 6 | VEERKAMP Molly | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 7 | WANG Ellen | V V V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 8 | SHANG Andrea | D D D V | V V V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 9 | NARANG Maya | V V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 10 | HOLLE Aviella S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 11 | SHEN Sophia | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 12 | SHEN Annabel | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 13 | YE Catherine | D D V V V | V D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 14 | YU Jaime L. | V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 15 | SADAN Jordan E. | D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 16 | KANIUK Rachel | V D D V D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | DU Hannah | V V V V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | WU Irene M. | D V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | V V V V D | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 20 | ZIMBALIST Lila | V V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 21 | LI Meilin | D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | RASO Sofia G. | V V V D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 23 | PAGES Melanie | V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 24 | PAVE Claire | D D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | V V D D D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | ZHANG Rongrui | D V V D D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 27 | LIU Sophia | V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 28 | CLEVENGER Magdalena | V D D D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 29 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | D V D V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | KURCHIN Ekaterina Y. | D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 31 | HUANG Natalie | D D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 32 | ZHEN Ellen | D V D D D | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 33 | NICOU Melina | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 34 | KARKHANIS Maya | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | TOBIN Brean | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 36 | WERBACH Esther | D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 37 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 38 | YANIV Liya | D D D D | D | 0.0 | 0 | - |
| 39 | SILVER Anna | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 40 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 41 | HUSAIN Amber | D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 42 | MORO Diana | D D D D D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.