Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% | |
2 | JONES LONGENBACH Melanie | - | 3% | 19% | 46% | 32% | ||
3 | XU Christine | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
3 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | - | 25% | 45% | 25% | 4% | ||
5 | MING YUE | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 2% | |
6 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
7 | WANG Ellen | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% | |
8 | SHANG Andrea | - | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | ||
9 | NARANG Maya | - | 7% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 3% | |
10 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | |
11 | SHEN Sophia | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 33% | 3% | |
12 | SHEN Annabel | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
13 | YE Catherine | 8% | 35% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | |
14 | YU Jaime L. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
15 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 7% | 31% | 44% | 19% | ||
16 | KANIUK Rachel | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - | |
17 | DU Hannah | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
18 | WU Irene M. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
19 | SHAW Kayla M. | - | - | 7% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
20 | ZIMBALIST Lila | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
21 | LI Meilin | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 6% | |
22 | RASO Sofia G. | - | - | - | 5% | 34% | 60% | |
23 | PAGES Melanie | 1% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | |
24 | PAVE Claire | 2% | 17% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
25 | DAVIDSON Sammy C. | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
26 | ZHANG Rongrui | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
27 | LIU Sophia | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | |
28 | CLEVENGER Magdalena | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% | |
29 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 14% | |
30 | KURCHIN Ekaterina Y. | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
31 | HUANG Natalie | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
32 | ZHEN Ellen | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
33 | NICOU Melina | 2% | 42% | 44% | 12% | 1% | - | |
34 | KARKHANIS Maya | 14% | 37% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - | |
35 | TOBIN Brean | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
36 | WERBACH Esther | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
37 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 25% | 46% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
38 | YANIV Liya | 98% | 2% | - | - | - | ||
39 | SILVER Anna | 31% | 46% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
40 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 1% | 10% | 33% | 38% | 16% | 2% | |
41 | HUSAIN Amber | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | - | |
42 | MORO Diana | 91% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.