Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KUGLER Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
2 | LI Jade | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 17% | |
3 | BOUDREAUX James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
3 | AHMED Mohsen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
5 | LEE Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 56% | |
6 | SINGLETON Aman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
7 | LEE DoWon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
8 | LEE Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
9 | HU Anton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
10 | MA YIXING (Tiger) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 10% |
11 | ROSIELLO Francesco | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
12 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 10% |
13 | KABA Elias | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
14 | YAMAGUCHI Yuzuki | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
15 | KIM Gene | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% | |
16 | TOWNSHEND Connor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
17 | LIU Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% | |
18 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 6% |
19 | RIM Eugene | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 16% | |
20 | CRESPO Nathaniel Justus | 100% | 97% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
21 | TESFAYE Elias | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 11% | |
22 | GLUSHKOV David | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 56% | 22% | 4% |
23 | CAFASSO Alexander | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
24 | MARIN Ayan N. | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
25 | BAI Brian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | CHEN Isaac Zhi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
27 | DURKIN Hudson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
28 | HE Bronto | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
29 | ZHU Yiming | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
30 | MEHROTRA Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 23% | |
31 | CAO Gavin | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | |
32 | PATHAK Arush | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
33 | MIDYANY Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
34 | LIU Jeremiah W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% | |
35 | SHCHUR Grayson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% | |
36 | WANG Eason | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | ZHANG Jonathan | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - | |
38 | GU Eric | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
39 | ROBERTS Arthur | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
40 | CUELLAR Markus | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | FOGEL Jake | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
42 | HELMY Richard | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
43 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - |
44 | TSIEN Richard | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
45 | NOOL Alexander | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
46 | KIM Zac | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - |
47 | PENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 7% |
48 | NG Nico | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 10% | 1% | |
49 | CHAN Ian | 100% | 32% | 3% | - | - | - | |
50 | HUANG Max | 100% | 88% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | |
51 | ZHAI Junqi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
52 | LIN ZIJIE | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
52 | MAXWELL Sheito | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
54 | FENG Xinmin | 100% | 66% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
55 | SOLOMON Aryeh | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
56 | ZHANG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
57 | VANDERMEER Joshua | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
58 | GRIGORENKO Gleb E. | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | SI Anderson | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
60 | ZHANG Shuhao | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | MA Owen | 100% | 96% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
62 | HANNA Alexander | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
63 | SHI Yeyu | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
64 | LIU-XUE Shuliang | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.