Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 2 | MORREALE John | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 13% |
| 3 | MICHELL Bailey | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 3 | HUAYTA James W. | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 5 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
| 6 | TAKEMARU Leo | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% | |
| 7 | LIU Kelly | - | - | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 1% |
| 8 | GANTA Vijay | 1% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | |
| 9 | WARD Fraser | - | - | 4% | 23% | 48% | 24% | |
| 10 | LASORSA Matthew | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
| 11 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 12 | YAO Jonathan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 13 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% | |
| 16 | ZHOU Miles | 3% | 32% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 17 | PEDERSEN Leif | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% | |
| 18 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
| 19 | TSODIKOV Matthew G. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 36% | 3% |
| 20 | KAHN Justin M. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
| 21 | LUO ZiRui | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
| 22 | HENNICKE Michael G. | - | 2% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
| 23 | WUN William | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 3% |
| 24 | LIN William | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | |
| 25 | PATTON Colin T. | 5% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 26 | SHAKER Maged | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 27 | SPRANG Nicholas D. | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 28 | HALL Justyn | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 29 | CHAN Alexander S. | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 29 | TANG Albert | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHAN Daniel | - | 6% | 31% | 45% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | TIERNO Thomas J. | 23% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ROSEN Ben | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | QIN Alexander | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 35 | PARK Tai H. | - | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 36 | MARTINEZ Justin | 16% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 37 | CONTRERAS Sebastian | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 38 | XU Eric | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 39 | DEWEY Charles J. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | YUAN Kevin | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 41 | DEFORD Kevin W. | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 42 | RUDNET Noah | 6% | 33% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | GEORGE Daniel | 6% | 32% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | HEREFORD Ramses D. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | NEVILLE James | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 49 | KEIRSTEAD Robert | 6% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.