Power Sports Academy - Martinez, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Miranda | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 2 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% |
| 3 | MA Isabelle | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 38% | 9% |
| 3 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | - | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 3% |
| 5 | TAO Ann | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 6 | LIU Ariana | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% | |
| 7 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 34% |
| 8 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 9 | YAO Abby | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% | |
| 10 | THERON Zoe | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
| 11 | DAI Iris Yuyang | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
| 12 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 38% |
| 13 | YU Sophie | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 14 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
| 15 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% |
| 16 | CHO Karis | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 40% | 15% | 1% |
| 17 | ZEE Savannah | - | - | - | 7% | 38% | 54% | |
| 18 | SOE Hayleigh | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 46% | 21% |
| 19 | PAN Samantha | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 20 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | WANG Doreen | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 21% | |
| 22 | LIN Allison | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% | |
| 23 | LI Chelsea | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | ZHU Yunyao | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 25 | LIN Avery | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 26 | TEWARI Amaira | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | XIA Isabella | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 28 | KIM Natalie | - | 2% | 15% | 47% | 31% | 5% | |
| 29 | WANG Ellen | 19% | 48% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 30 | HAN Gian | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 15% |
| 31 | JENA Aanvi | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | TAN Shouyin | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 5% | |
| 33 | SAH Madeleine | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 34 | LEE Zoe E. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 35 | CHAN Ella | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 36 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 7% | 34% | 44% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | ZHANG Elizabeth | 1% | 12% | 38% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 38 | ZHANG Queeny | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
| 39 | LI Audrey | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 40 | YU Xintong | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 41 | KIM Audrey | 1% | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 42 | DONG Nancy | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | OTAEGI Elorri | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | PARK Lauren | - | - | 2% | 14% | 45% | 39% | |
| 45 | AHN Hayley | 1% | 9% | 35% | 39% | 14% | 2% | |
| 46 | ARYA Leela | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 47 | TANG Amelia | 2% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 48 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 5% | 31% | 49% | 15% | |
| 49 | HOM Emma | 3% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 50 | DVOIRIS Maya | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 51 | TAI Taphanie | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 52 | NICOLETTI Thea | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 54 | YU-TAN Claire | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LEE Abigail | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | HONDA Emi | 13% | 48% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
| 57 | DEJOY Leilah | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 58 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 59 | CHU Lauren | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | THOTA Akira | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 61 | GUO Jianing | 24% | 58% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 62 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 29% | 45% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 63 | COLIC LANI | 26% | 46% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 64 | JOESUF Aurielle | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 65 | PARK Seojeong | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 66 | LAU Shu Yeung Sophia | 1% | 14% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | STERNAD Pia | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 68 | Q Mia | 42% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | JIN Jada Y | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 70 | LIU Madeleine | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 71 | YANG Byanca | 46% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 72 | SARANGAN Ovia | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 73 | PAWAR Sanvi | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 74 | THERIOT Reagan | 29% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | HUYNH Evangeline | < 1% | 7% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 76 | FISHER Sienna | 2% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 76 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 75% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | YIN Anthea | 43% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 78 | SUH Mia | < 1% | 6% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 80 | FISCHER Evangeline | 1% | 20% | 55% | 22% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.