Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 2 | SONG Aidan | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
| 3 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
| 3 | CHO Adrian | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 5 | LEE Harrison | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
| 6 | KATS Brandon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
| 7 | CHEN Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 8 | FRIZZELL Kai | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
| 9 | TANG Colin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 10 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
| 11 | SHAPIRO Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
| 12 | BHANDARE Veer | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 13 | CHEN Evan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 14 | WU Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
| 15 | KIM Louie | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Jason | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 17 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 28% | 10% |
| 18 | DANA Miles | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 19 | LAI Jayden | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 20 | JIN Derek | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 21 | SMITH Theo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
| 23 | NOOL Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 24 | YAKHNIS Seth | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 25 | CHEN Jayden A | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 26 | ROFINO Samuel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
| 27 | LI Nolan | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 28 | YOON Jonathan | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 29 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 30 | ZHENG Jasper | - | 3% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 31 | SHAO Mason | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 32 | DAND Zahin | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 33 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 14% |
| 34 | LANE Sawyer | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | GUJJA Rishabh | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | ZINCHUK Yuri | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 37 | DIMOV Daniel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 38 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 39 | DAI Jason | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 40 | LI Jayden | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HAMILTON Tyler | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | MILLER Brodrick | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 43 | CHEN Regis | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 44 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 45 | YAN Milan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KESELMAN Ron | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 47 | SCOGGIN Charles | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | KIM Brendan | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 49 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SHI Evan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 51 | CHEN Hayden | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 52 | LAI Jaxon | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | GREGORY Milo | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 54 | YAO Irvine | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 55 | RUDIGER George | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | YU George | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 57 | LIN Aiden | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | LIU Kyle | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 58 | QI Bryan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | LANDMAN Martin | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | CHEN Boru | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.