Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUO Alexander | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
2 | SONG Aidan | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
3 | ARMSTRONG Payson | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% | |
3 | CHO Adrian | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
5 | LEE Harrison | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 7% |
6 | KATS Brandon | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 12% |
7 | CHEN Daniel | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
8 | FRIZZELL Kai | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
9 | TANG Colin | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
10 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
11 | SHAPIRO Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% | |
12 | BHANDARE Veer | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
13 | CHEN Evan | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
14 | WU Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% |
15 | KIM Louie | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
16 | ZHENG Jason | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
17 | CHEN Tianjun | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 28% | 10% |
18 | DANA Miles | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
19 | LAI Jayden | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
20 | JIN Derek | 23% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
21 | SMITH Theo | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
22 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
23 | NOOL Aaron | - | 2% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
24 | YAKHNIS Seth | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
25 | CHEN Jayden A | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
26 | ROFINO Samuel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% |
27 | LI Nolan | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
28 | YOON Jonathan | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
29 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
30 | ZHENG Jasper | - | 3% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
31 | SHAO Mason | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
32 | DAND Zahin | 1% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
33 | MASKIN Mikhail | - | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 14% |
34 | LANE Sawyer | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
35 | GUJJA Rishabh | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
36 | ZINCHUK Yuri | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
37 | DIMOV Daniel | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
38 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | DAI Jason | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
40 | LI Jayden | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | HAMILTON Tyler | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
42 | MILLER Brodrick | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
43 | CHEN Regis | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
44 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | YAN Milan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
46 | KESELMAN Ron | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
47 | SCOGGIN Charles | 11% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
48 | KIM Brendan | 26% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
49 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
50 | SHI Evan | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | |
51 | CHEN Hayden | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
52 | LAI Jaxon | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | GREGORY Milo | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
54 | YAO Irvine | 13% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
55 | RUDIGER George | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
56 | YU George | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
57 | LIN Aiden | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
58 | LIU Kyle | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
58 | QI Bryan | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
60 | LANDMAN Martin | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
61 | CHEN Boru | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.