Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
2 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 40% |
3 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | |
3 | CHO Adrian | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
5 | LEE Harrison | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 7% |
6 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% |
7 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
8 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
9 | TANG Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
10 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 19% |
11 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% | |
12 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 15% | 2% |
13 | CHEN Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
14 | WU Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 9% |
15 | KIM Louie | 100% | 87% | 56% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | ZHENG Jason | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
17 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 37% | 10% |
18 | DANA Miles | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
19 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
20 | JIN Derek | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
21 | SMITH Theo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
22 | HOREMIOTIS Bennett | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 2% |
23 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 25% | 5% |
24 | YAKHNIS Seth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
25 | CHEN Jayden A | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
26 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
27 | LI Nolan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | |
28 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
29 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
30 | ZHENG Jasper | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
31 | SHAO Mason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
32 | DAND Zahin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
33 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 14% |
34 | LANE Sawyer | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
35 | GUJJA Rishabh | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
36 | ZINCHUK Yuri | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
37 | DIMOV Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
38 | WILLIAMS Gavin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | DAI Jason | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
40 | LI Jayden | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | HAMILTON Tyler | 100% | 82% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | |
42 | MILLER Brodrick | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
43 | CHEN Regis | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
44 | MALLAKIS Efstathios | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
45 | YAN Milan | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
46 | KESELMAN Ron | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
47 | SCOGGIN Charles | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
48 | KIM Brendan | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
49 | YU MAXIMILIAN | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
50 | SHI Evan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
51 | CHEN Hayden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% |
52 | LAI Jaxon | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | GREGORY Milo | 100% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
54 | YAO Irvine | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
55 | RUDIGER George | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | YU George | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
57 | LIN Aiden | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
58 | LIU Kyle | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
58 | QI Bryan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
60 | LANDMAN Martin | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
61 | CHEN Boru | 100% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.