Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LUCAS William | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% |
| 2 | KHANNA Adamantis | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 3 | SONG Aidan | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 3 | BRADY Jack | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 5 | LAU Kyrus | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
| 6 | SHAPIRO Leo | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 7 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 8 | MOGUNOV Alan | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | BURENKOV Matthew | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 10 | MIAO Heqi | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 11 | BEAL Colton | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 12 | STOLCKE Julian | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | CHAN Ewan | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 14 | HU Simon | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
| 15 | HOWARTH Hayes | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 17 | TITOV Zachary | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 18 | BROOKS Drake | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 11% |
| 19 | AVERY Marcus | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 32% |
| 20 | LLOYD Max | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | - |
| 21 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 22 | TERENTIEV Michael | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 23 | ZHANG Howard | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 24 | PATEL Rohan | - | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% |
| 25 | HAHN EVER | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
| 26 | QIN Lucas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
| 27 | NARAYAN Rishi | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | BENNETT Lachlan | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | LEISTNER Armin | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% |
| 30 | GAO Francis | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SABINO Bennett | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 32 | LEIGH Brayden | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 33 | ALLEN Parker | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 34 | SONG Jerry | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | BLAIR Campbell | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 36 | MARTIRE Francis | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LEE Shane Gunn | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | WANG Harrison | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 39 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | |
| 40 | RAJ Adithya | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | LI Jayden | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | SEDAKA Dylan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | LI Kent | 9% | 34% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | GAW Christian | 5% | 26% | 41% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | LEE Davis | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LI Sebastian | 40% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 47 | LEE Jeffrey | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 48 | BORNHOLZ Lawrence | 1% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 49 | BURNS Carson | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 50 | CHEN Tyler | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | DAI Ethan | 19% | 50% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | FAZELINIA Erfaan | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 53 | MOROAICA Seiku | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% |
| 54 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | GAW Zachary | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 56 | KONG Ethan | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 57 | SINHA Nalin | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | PEREZ Simon | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 59 | LEE Weston | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 60 | KULJIEV Boyan | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | LI Felix | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.