Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LUCAS William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
2 | KHANNA Adamantis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 62% |
3 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 20% |
3 | BRADY Jack | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 8% | |
5 | LAU Kyrus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% |
6 | SHAPIRO Leo | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
7 | LIM JUWANA Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
8 | MOGUNOV Alan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
9 | BURENKOV Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
10 | MIAO Heqi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
11 | BEAL Colton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% |
12 | STOLCKE Julian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
13 | CHAN Ewan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
14 | HU Simon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
15 | HOWARTH Hayes | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
16 | BALTRUSAITIS Lucas Tommaso | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
17 | TITOV Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% |
18 | BROOKS Drake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
19 | AVERY Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 32% |
20 | LLOYD Max | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 10% | - |
21 | ARCHIBALD Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
22 | TERENTIEV Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
23 | ZHANG Howard | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
24 | PATEL Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 32% | 5% |
25 | HAHN EVER | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 2% |
26 | QIN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
27 | NARAYAN Rishi | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
28 | BENNETT Lachlan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
29 | LEISTNER Armin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
30 | GAO Francis | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
31 | SABINO Bennett | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
32 | LEIGH Brayden | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
33 | ALLEN Parker | 100% | 79% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | |
34 | SONG Jerry | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% | |
35 | BLAIR Campbell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 4% |
36 | MARTIRE Francis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
37 | LEE Shane Gunn | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
38 | WANG Harrison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
39 | CIECIEREGA MATTHEW | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | |
40 | RAJ Adithya | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
41 | LI Jayden | 100% | 83% | 45% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
42 | SEDAKA Dylan | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
43 | LI Kent | 100% | 91% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
44 | GAW Christian | 100% | 95% | 69% | 28% | 5% | - | - |
45 | LEE Davis | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
46 | LI Sebastian | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
47 | LEE Jeffrey | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
48 | BORNHOLZ Lawrence | 100% | 99% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
49 | BURNS Carson | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
50 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
51 | DAI Ethan | 100% | 81% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
52 | FAZELINIA Erfaan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
53 | MOROAICA Seiku | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
54 | RAJMOHAN Syon | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
55 | GAW Zachary | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
56 | KONG Ethan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
57 | SINHA Nalin | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
58 | PEREZ Simon | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
59 | LEE Weston | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - |
60 | KULJIEV Boyan | 100% | 60% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
61 | LI Felix | 100% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.