Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MORRILL William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% |
2 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% |
3 | FELDMAN Drew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
3 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
5 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 12% |
6 | YOOK Isaac | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
7 | ZHAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 63% | 23% |
8 | KIM Theodore | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% | |
9 | SUBA Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 8% |
10 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 26% | 3% |
11 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
12 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% |
12 | LIN Maxim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 42% |
14 | BALE ATMAN | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | - |
15 | PINTO Marcus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% | |
16 | WEISS Toby | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
17 | LIU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 16% |
18 | CLARK Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 35% | - |
19 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 7% | |
20 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
21 | ZHEXUAN yu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 24% |
22 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 14% | - |
23 | WEI William | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
24 | SASSI Ilyas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 17% | - |
25 | SAKAYEDA Jacob | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
26 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
27 | BARENBOYM Michael | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - |
28 | MEYERSON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 34% | |
29 | CLARK Aram | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
30 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | - |
31 | ALMEDA Stanislav | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
32 | CRAWFORD William | 100% | 92% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
33 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 17% | 2% | |
34 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | |
35 | KMETA-SUAREZ Graysen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
36 | NOTOPRADONO Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
37 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
38 | JI Johnson | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
39 | SAGE Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 5% |
40 | FIROOZI Sam | 100% | 92% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
41 | KARAVAS Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
41 | AROUNA Ilan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
43 | QASBA Rudrh | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
44 | DEELY Hartigan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
45 | FORSTED Ian | 100% | 92% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
46 | DE SIENA Salvatore | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
47 | RIDKY Sam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
48 | BELAND Riley James "RJ" | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 32% | 5% | - |
49 | LIM Brandon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 3% |
50 | GREENE Kevin | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | MHLEY Gavin | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CHU Kaden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 31% | 4% | - |
53 | LORENZ Evan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
54 | NAJI Ethan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
55 | LIEU Nicholas | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
56 | BRADBURY Noah | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | LIEBOWITZ Carson | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
58 | JIANG Terence | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | SAYAR Luke | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
60 | HOWARD Demani | 100% | 90% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
60 | WASCO Andrew | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
62 | SARWAHI Viraat | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 10% | 2% | - |
62 | GINGERY Julian | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
64 | MENZIES Liam | 100% | 39% | 6% | - | - | - | |
65 | KENNEDY Tomás | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | KRAYTMAN Matthew | 100% | 81% | 37% | 7% | - | - | |
67 | GAO Kai | 100% | 89% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
68 | AMSTER Auren | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
68 | WITHAM Leo | 100% | 62% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
70 | CHEN Brendan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% | - |
71 | ZHANG Ray | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - |
72 | RAJMOHAN Arya | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
73 | HE Eric | 100% | 62% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | QUINTERO Mateo | 100% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
75 | KULKARNI Ishir | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.