Round Rock, TX - Round Rock, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | SENIC Adeline | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 3 | CHEW Alexis T. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 5 | NAIR Supriya | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | LIU Jaelyn A. | V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 7 | CUI Amy | V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 8 | COOPER Piper W. | D D V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 9 | SHA Yi Ling | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 10 | ELNAGGAR lily | V V V D V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 11 | TUCKER ALARCON Frida | V V D V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | WILLIS Fletcher L. | D V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 13 | CHEN Chloe I. | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | HOBSON Ava | V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 15 | MANIKTALA Prisha | V V D D D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 16 | CHOI Kailyn | D D D V V D | V V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | SINGH Ashni | V V V V V | D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 18 | NISSINOFF Alexandra | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 19 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | V D D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 20 | YURKOVA Mariia | D V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | YAN Noelle | D V V V D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 22 | CHANG Elizabeth | D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 23 | POPOKH Aleksandra | V D D V D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 24 | SOLDATOVA Maria | D V V D D | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 25 | CROMWELL Keira | D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 26 | KIM Rachel | D V D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 27 | LI Irina | V V D D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | D V D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 29 | SHORI Samantha | D D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 30 | LUH Mia P. | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | CHU Camille | D D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 32 | HSU Kaylin | D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 33 | CHAGARES Isabella | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | LAI Sophia | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | DODDABALLAPUR Saanvi | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 36 | TEPMAN Alexandra D. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 37 | BLAKE Saylen | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 38 | CHEN Stephanie | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.