Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 42% |
2 | SHAPIRO Leon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 20% |
3 | KLOTZ Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% |
3 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 27% |
5 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
6 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
7 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
8 | MILLER Jordan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 12% | |
9 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
10 | PLASTARAS Trey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 11% |
11 | JIN Andy | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
12 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | 6% | |
13 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | |
14 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 31% | 4% |
15 | GE Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 44% | 9% |
16 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 34% | 6% |
17 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
18 | TJON Calum | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
19 | BAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 36% | 7% |
20 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
21 | FENG Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | |
21 | MATTOS Luis Felipe | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% | 1% | |
23 | CHA James | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
24 | BAI Austin | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - |
25 | CHANDRAMOHAN Aran | 100% | 94% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
25 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% |
27 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
28 | LI Ayren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 23% | |
29 | BLEIL Tyler | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
30 | SALEH Omar | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
31 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
32 | MARTIN Mason | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
33 | SHANNON Jack | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
34 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
35 | XU Brian | 100% | 78% | 34% | 6% | - | - | |
36 | WEST Nathaniel | 100% | 91% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
37 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
38 | SICAT Justin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
39 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
40 | STAFFORD Gareth | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - |
41 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | - | |
42 | CHINN Callum | 100% | 87% | 46% | 9% | 1% | - | |
43 | POLLIO Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
45 | PEDERSEN Charles | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
46 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
47 | SFINTESCU Alex | 100% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
48 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
50 | WEBSTER Declan | 100% | 98% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
51 | GECKELER James | 100% | 92% | 59% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
52 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
52 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
54 | HU Daniel | 100% | 65% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | SABATINO Patrick | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
56 | LEVIN Jack | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | HOWARD Mekai | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
58 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 69% | 23% | 2% | - | - | |
59 | GORLOVITZKI Amitai | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - | |
60 | COUAILLIER Leo | 100% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
61 | ZIMMERMAN Kaden | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.