Chelsea Piers Athletic Club - Stamford, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | CHOI Charlotte | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
2 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | GONG Joy | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
3 | CHOWDHERY Myra | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
5 | ZHAO Selena | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
6 | ZHANG Ashley | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
7 | KIM Grace | V V V D D | V V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
8 | MALUKI Nia | V D D V D V | V V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
9 | MULLER Inara | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | ZHENG Winona | V V V V D V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
11 | KATZ Emma | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
12 | WANG Keira | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
13 | MAK Jayden | V V D D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
14 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
15 | WANG Chloe | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
16 | ZHANG Audrey | D V V V V D | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
17 | LAU Angela | V V V V D V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
18 | JOHN Sophia | V V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
19 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | D V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
20 | SMITH Genevieve | D D V V V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
21 | KONDE Anika | D V D V V V | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
22 | PASSMAN Caroline | V D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
23 | CHEN Chloe | V D V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
24 | DEMRY Kylee | D V D D V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
25 | FONG Zoe | V V D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
26 | GU Allison | V D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
27 | DANIELS Jordanna | D V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
28 | MOFFITT Charlotte | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
29 | MAGITSKY Giadora | D D D D V V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
30 | KARAVAS Lucy | D D D D V V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
31 | CANARAN Daphne M. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
32 | KETT alexis | D D V D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
33 | MENON Maya | V V D V D V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
34 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | V V D D V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
35 | TOM Danielle | V D V D D V | D | 1.2 | 3 | +1.8 |
36 | YOUNG Sienna | V D D D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
37 | YAP Anna | D V V V D D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
38 | ILICHEVA Adriana | D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
39 | FREY Elise | V D D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
39 | WU Abigail | D V D V D D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
41 | AVATAPALLI Sri Aadya | D D V D V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
42 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | V V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
43 | WILLER Anna | D V D V D D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
44 | BINSHTOK Ariana | D V V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
45 | MADDISON Estelle | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
46 | GROSSMAN Ann | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
47 | GERALDINO Sofia | V D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
48 | RIFKIN Talia | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
49 | LIAO Audrey | D D V D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
50 | CHANG Grace | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
51 | PARAISO Isabella | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
52 | KRITZ Sofia | D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
53 | POTDAR Harper | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
54 | WU Jing | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
55 | NEVELING Felicitas | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.