The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

October NAC

Div II Women's Foil

Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 2:00 PM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 GAYDOS Sofia C. V V V V V D V V V V V V 3.6 5 +1.4
2 LEVI Lea V D V V V D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
3 REN Olivia Y. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
3 KONG Olivia V D V V V D V V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
5 YE Eileen V V V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
6 JO Mia C. D V V V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
7 CEPERO Rosabel V V V D V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
8 BRADFORD Meeah V D V D V V V V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
9 MASSICK Laine D V V V V V V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
10 OH Erin H. V V V V V D V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
11 LI Phoebe J. V V V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
12 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa D D V V V V V V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
13 KOENIG Charlotte R. D V V V V D V V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
14 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. V V V D D V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
15 HALL Velma V D V V D V V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
16 YHIP Mikaela M. V D D D V V V V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
17 HO Brianna W. V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
18 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) V V V V V V V D 4.6 6 +1.4
19 GOMES Rafaella T. V V V V V V V D 4.9 6 +1.1
20 ALTEN Ayaka V D V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
21 BANIN Alexandra G. V V V V D V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
22 CAO Arianna L. V D V V V V V D 5.1 5 -0.1
23 UPTON Elizabeth V V V V V D V D 4.7 5 +0.3
24 TRAN Ava D. V D V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
25 VEERKAMP Molly V V V V D D V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
25 DE LA CRUZ Alyssa D D V V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
27 CHEN Shiuan-An Shannon V V D V D V V V D 4.9 4 -0.9
28 ATLURI Srija V V V D V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
29 LUO ZIWEN V V V D D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
30 CASTANEDA Erika L. V V D D V D V V D 4.9 3 -1.9
31 KLINE Melissa C. D V D D D V V D 0.6 1 +0.4
32 MARLEY-WEAVER Jordan D D D D D V V V D 1.6 1 -0.6
33 KONG Chin-Yi V V V V V V D 2.7 6 +3.3
34 KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) V D V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
35 SARTORI Taylor M. D V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
36 LAU Chloe M. V V V D V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
37 LEE Paulina V V V V V D D 4.8 5 +0.2
38 WU Irene M. V V V D V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
39 DE LA CRUZ Ava D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
40 LOCKE Savannah V V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
41 PERLMAN Talia V V D V V V D 1.9 4 +2.1
42 FERNANDES Thea V D V D V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
43 SHANG Andrea D V V D V V V D 2.7 4 +1.3
43 RASO Sofia G. D V V D V V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
45 ZHENG Ivy V V V D V D V D 5.0 4 -1.0
46 BOODELL Ella D V V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 HIRSCH Sophie A. V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
48 KIM Kayla A. D V D V V V V D 3.7 4 +0.3
49 MOLHO Sofia D V V D V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
50 PROCOPIO Lucia V V D D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
51 LEE Angelina S. V V V V D D V D 2.2 4 +1.8
52 LI Shuang D D V V V V D 1.7 3 +1.3
53 XU Christine V D D V V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
54 CHO Gracie L. D V V V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
55 PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) D V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
56 SUN Danica Z. D V V D V D V D 3.5 3 -0.5
57 RATSEP Ariel D V V D D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
58 WONG Julia M. V D D V V D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
59 CHAMBERLAIN Lola J. D V D D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
60 HOLLE Aviella S. V V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
61 CHUNG Ashley J. V D D V D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
62 HAGOPIAN Natalie V D V D D D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
63 ADAMS KIM Natalie D V D V D D V D 2.0 2 -
64 CHON Sydney V D D V D D V D 3.8 2 -1.8
65 SADAN Jordan E. D D V V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
66 PAPADAKIS Lily V D D V V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
67 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. D V V D V D 1.8 3 +1.2
68 SAXENA SEJAL D V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
69 YEH Marissa E. V D D V V D D 2.3 3 +0.7
70 WEINTRAUB Io H. D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
71 LEE Jessica Doyun D V D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
72 WU Julianna Y. V D V D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
73 VOHRA Anusha V D D D D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
74 SU Alysa J. V D V D D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
75 THOMAS Aaria S. D D D V V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
76 YIN Helen V D D V D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
77 PO Edith V D V D D D D 3.7 2 -1.7
78 SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) V D V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
79 SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. V V D D D D D 2.6 2 -0.6
80 POWERS Kathryn D D D V D V D 1.0 2 +1.0
81 SHEPTAK Gabrielle V D D V D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
82 COKER Bettina M. D V V D D D D 3.1 2 -1.1
83 MING YUE D V D V D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
84 BECCHINA Claire E. D D D V D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
85 VONA Elena M. V D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
86 RAMAN Tanvi D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
87 AMISTOSO Jeanne D V D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
88 HOBSON Leena D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
89 NARANG Maya D D D V D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
90 GEE Bea L. D D D D D V D 1.5 1 -0.5
91 WANG ROBIN D D D V D D D 0.7 1 +0.3
92 BERG Stephanie A. V D D D D D D 2.7 1 -1.7
93 MULLENEX Laura D D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
94 WESTFALL Cindy M. D D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
94 KELBLEY Elena J. D D D D V D D 1.2 1 -0.2
96 CHUNG Rachel J. D D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
97 SIMPSON Lydia Q. D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
98 SCHATZ Kristina J. D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
99 STONE Colleen R. D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
99 HIRSCH Gabriella H. D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
101 DRAGNE Alexis D. D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
102 HEISER Anna M. D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
102 SULLIVAN Aya M. D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4
104 BOLES Sophia D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
105 HICKS Bronwen D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
106 SCHWARTZMAN Salma D D D D D D D 0.3 0 -0.3
106 OLEDZKA Julia D D D D D D D 1.7 0 -1.7
108 LAMBERT Lisa L. D D D D D D D 1.5 0 -1.5

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.