Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GAYDOS Sofia C. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% |
| 2 | LEVI Lea | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 3 | REN Olivia Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 3 | KONG Olivia | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 5 | YE Eileen | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 6 | JO Mia C. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | CEPERO Rosabel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 18% | 3% |
| 8 | BRADFORD Meeah | - | - | 3% | 23% | 46% | 28% | |
| 9 | MASSICK Laine | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 10 | OH Erin H. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 11 | LI Phoebe J. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 4% |
| 12 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 13 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% |
| 14 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 33% | 33% | 13% |
| 15 | HALL Velma | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 16 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 17 | HO Brianna W. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 20% | |
| 18 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 17% |
| 19 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% |
| 20 | ALTEN Ayaka | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | BANIN Alexandra G. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% |
| 22 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 44% | 34% |
| 23 | UPTON Elizabeth | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 24 | TRAN Ava D. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
| 25 | VEERKAMP Molly | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 25 | DE LA CRUZ Alyssa | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 27 | CHEN Shiuan-An Shannon | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 28 | ATLURI Srija | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | LUO ZIWEN | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 30 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 31 | KLINE Melissa C. | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | MARLEY-WEAVER Jordan | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KONG Chin-Yi | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | < 1% |
| 34 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 35 | SARTORI Taylor M. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 42% | 20% |
| 36 | LAU Chloe M. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 37 | LEE Paulina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 22% |
| 38 | WU Irene M. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 39 | DE LA CRUZ Ava | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% | |
| 40 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 1% | 11% | 37% | 39% | 13% | |
| 41 | PERLMAN Talia | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 42 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 43 | SHANG Andrea | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 43 | RASO Sofia G. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
| 45 | ZHENG Ivy | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 29% |
| 46 | BOODELL Ella | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | HIRSCH Sophie A. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 48 | KIM Kayla A. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 3% |
| 49 | MOLHO Sofia | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 46% | 38% |
| 50 | PROCOPIO Lucia | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 51 | LEE Angelina S. | 2% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 52 | LI Shuang | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 53 | XU Christine | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 54 | CHO Gracie L. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 55 | PARKER Emilie Rose (Rosie) | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 56 | SUN Danica Z. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 57 | RATSEP Ariel | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 58 | WONG Julia M. | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 59 | CHAMBERLAIN Lola J. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 60 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 10% | |
| 61 | CHUNG Ashley J. | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 62 | HAGOPIAN Natalie | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 63 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 64 | CHON Sydney | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 34% | 23% | 6% |
| 65 | SADAN Jordan E. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 66 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 20% |
| 67 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 68 | SAXENA SEJAL | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 69 | YEH Marissa E. | 2% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 70 | WEINTRAUB Io H. | 1% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 71 | LEE Jessica Doyun | 33% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 72 | WU Julianna Y. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 73 | VOHRA Anusha | 1% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 74 | SU Alysa J. | 2% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 75 | THOMAS Aaria S. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 76 | YIN Helen | 5% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 77 | PO Edith | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 78 | SONG ShuXuan (Liliya) | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 79 | SANTOS Annika Beatrice I. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 80 | POWERS Kathryn | 29% | 46% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 81 | SHEPTAK Gabrielle | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | COKER Bettina M. | - | 4% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 83 | MING YUE | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 84 | BECCHINA Claire E. | 26% | 47% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 85 | VONA Elena M. | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 86 | RAMAN Tanvi | 2% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
| 87 | AMISTOSO Jeanne | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 88 | HOBSON Leena | 14% | 55% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 89 | NARANG Maya | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 90 | GEE Bea L. | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 91 | WANG ROBIN | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 92 | BERG Stephanie A. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 93 | MULLENEX Laura | 47% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 94 | WESTFALL Cindy M. | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 94 | KELBLEY Elena J. | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 96 | CHUNG Rachel J. | 1% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 97 | SIMPSON Lydia Q. | 14% | 41% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 98 | SCHATZ Kristina J. | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 99 | STONE Colleen R. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 99 | HIRSCH Gabriella H. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 101 | DRAGNE Alexis D. | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 102 | HEISER Anna M. | 18% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 102 | SULLIVAN Aya M. | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 104 | BOLES Sophia | 36% | 45% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 105 | HICKS Bronwen | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 106 | SCHWARTZMAN Salma | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 106 | OLEDZKA Julia | 6% | 33% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 108 | LAMBERT Lisa L. | 13% | 40% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.