William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HENDERSON James C. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | RAUSCHER Ryan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 3 | LIN Felix | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 3 | JACKSON Evan | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 5 | PARCELL Colby | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 6 | XU Ivan | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | FENKER William M. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 8 | XU Emily T. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 9 | BENE Andrew | V V V D V V | V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 10 | SEMP Brannon A. | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | GOLART Dylan | D V V D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 12 | BENE Paul | D D V V V | V D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 13 | LAUDO Joseph | V D D V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 14 | MAUREL Nicolas | V V D D V D | V D | 4.1 | 3 | -1.1 |
| 15 | GOSNELL James | V V D D D V | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 16 | SU Ji | D D D V V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 17 | LE TAN | V V D V V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 18 | REEDER Nicholas W. | D V V V D V | D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 19 | FENG Brendan | D D V V V V | D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 20 | BAIN Tiernan | V D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 21 | FANG Elena | V D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 22 | FOREST Sung | V D V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 23 | FANG Darcy | D D V V D V | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 24 | RACHAPROLU DIVYAGNYAAN Siddartha | D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 25 | FLEEGER Sophia | D D D V V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 26 | LESTYAN Cat | V D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 26 | WANG Ziyao | D V V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | CHON-BAKER Hayden | D D V D V D | V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 29 | URIBE David | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 30 | LAWLESS Elizabeth | D D D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | RUDMIN Peter | D D D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
| 32 | FIGLOZZI Cordelia | D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | WALLACE Leo | D V D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 34 | BORGESON Abigail | V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 35 | SILK Ryan | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 36 | HUANG Anni | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | ZHOU Deborah | D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 38 | HILLEARY Mike | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 39 | KEESEE Devon | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.