William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HENDERSON James C. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 21% | 77% |
| 2 | RAUSCHER Ryan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 21% |
| 3 | LIN Felix | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 16% |
| 3 | JACKSON Evan | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% | |
| 5 | PARCELL Colby | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 6 | XU Ivan | - | - | 1% | 15% | 45% | 38% | 2% |
| 7 | FENKER William M. | - | - | 3% | 24% | 49% | 24% | |
| 8 | XU Emily T. | - | - | 2% | 18% | 45% | 35% | |
| 9 | BENE Andrew | - | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 10 | SEMP Brannon A. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 47% | 20% | |
| 11 | GOLART Dylan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 12 | BENE Paul | 30% | 54% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 13 | LAUDO Joseph | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 14 | MAUREL Nicolas | - | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
| 15 | GOSNELL James | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 26% | 1% |
| 16 | SU Ji | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LE TAN | - | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | |
| 18 | REEDER Nicholas W. | - | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% |
| 19 | FENG Brendan | - | 1% | 14% | 52% | 29% | 4% | - |
| 20 | BAIN Tiernan | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 21 | FANG Elena | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 22 | FOREST Sung | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
| 23 | FANG Darcy | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 24 | RACHAPROLU DIVYAGNYAAN Siddartha | 5% | 30% | 41% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | FLEEGER Sophia | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 26 | LESTYAN Cat | 21% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 26 | WANG Ziyao | 1% | 12% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | CHON-BAKER Hayden | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 29 | URIBE David | 1% | 17% | 57% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | LAWLESS Elizabeth | 11% | 49% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | RUDMIN Peter | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | FIGLOZZI Cordelia | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WALLACE Leo | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | BORGESON Abigail | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 35 | SILK Ryan | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 36 | HUANG Anni | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZHOU Deborah | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | HILLEARY Mike | 2% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 39 | KEESEE Devon | 50% | 41% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.