USF Recreation and Wellness Center North Gym - tampa, FL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% | |
2 | ZHOU Alec Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% |
3 | CHENG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% |
3 | SALLAM Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 13% |
5 | ROMERO KURI Carlos Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 24% | |
6 | DUPREE Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 16% |
7 | SKILLMAN Natalie | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 57% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
8 | OH Hakjae | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
9 | WANG Bryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
10 | MIZRAHI Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 4% |
11 | CORBIN Bennett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
12 | OTERO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
13 | ALVIOR Jacob A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 51% | 6% | |
14 | DINKINS Adam | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
15 | FREY Wayne N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
16 | BOLLE Elijah | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
17 | IRWIN Peter | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 33% |
18 | HAWKINS Sophia | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
19 | CREMONA Viola Maria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 2% |
20 | KHATIB Tamim | 100% | 99% | 88% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
21 | CUEVA Viola | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | |
22 | CUPO Anthony | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | HERARD Weiman | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 46% | 10% |
24 | BEATTY Thomas | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - | |
25 | GUERRERO Guillermo | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - | |
26 | SEEDS Aidan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
27 | CREMONA Diego Maria | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
28 | SCHULTZ Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
29 | SADWICK Evan | 100% | 96% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
30 | GRIFFITHS Wesley | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | MUMMIDI Rishi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | - | |
32 | YOUNG Nicholas | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
33 | DOSS matthew | 100% | 97% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
34 | HUSZAR Sara | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - | |
35 | RODDENBERRY Steven | 100% | 95% | 67% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | ALVIOR Jonathan Adrian | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
37 | WALTER Anna | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
38 | INTERTHAL William J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | RAKAJ Jozef | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 59% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
40 | FERNANDEZ Bohdin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
41 | GROSSE Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | |
42 | MA Victor | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
43 | WANG Aaron | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | MESNER Talyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
45 | MIZRAHI Mika | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
46 | KARPF Jonah | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
47 | PLESS Richard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
48 | NONKOOKETKHONG Pakon | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
49 | BROOKS David | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | CHAVARIN Alessandro | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 21% | 5% | - | |
51 | LOBEL Dillan | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
52 | MORENO Mariapaz | 100% | 72% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
53 | NGUYEN Catarina | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.