Riverside Hilton - New Orleans, LA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FLANAGAN James | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
2 | DE BARROS CONTI Thibaut | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 10% |
3 | O'CONNOR Ryan (Ryan O'Connor) D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% | |
3 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 23% | 4% | |
5 | LESNIAK Chuck | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
6 | POOLE James M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% | |
7 | QUARLES Jr Mark (Stewart Quarles) S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | |
8 | KONG Raymond | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
9 | TOWSTER Robert | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
10 | DANTON Gary | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
11 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
12 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
13 | EXNICIOS Richard M. | 100% | 77% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
14 | MARCUS Peter | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
14 | PRECCIOZZI Aldo F. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | GELLER Alan S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
17 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
18 | GARDNER William | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% | |
19 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
20 | ZAIDI Sohail | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | - |
21 | EILTS Bruce E. | 100% | 67% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
22 | KEOUGH Andy | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
23 | HEBERT David | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | |
24 | WOJCIK Edward | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
25 | JENKINS Michael | 100% | 69% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.