San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THERON Zoe | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% |
| 2 | LIU Ariana | - | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 59% |
| 3 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
| 3 | LI Alice | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 46% |
| 5 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 41% | 41% |
| 6 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 40% | 50% |
| 7 | LI Chelsea | - | 1% | 6% | 30% | 42% | 19% | 2% |
| 8 | HSIAO Ariya | - | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 41% | 10% |
| 9 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 10 | THOTA Akira | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | TAO Ann | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% |
| 12 | TAI Taphanie | 2% | 16% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 13 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 44% | 16% |
| 14 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 43% | 13% |
| 15 | ZHANG Queeny | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 16 | JIN Jada Y | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | ARYA Leela | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 18% | 2% |
| 19 | LEE Zoe E. | - | 2% | 17% | 42% | 33% | 7% | |
| 20 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 49% | 18% |
| 21 | XIA Isabella | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
| 22 | ZHU Yunyao | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 3% |
| 23 | TEWARI Amaira | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 24 | FANG Kelervia | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 7% |
| 25 | HSU Rachel | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 26 | LEE Abigail | - | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 27 | WANG Doreen | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 40% | 12% | |
| 28 | LI Joy | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 29 | KIM Natalie | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 30 | AHN Hayley | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 31 | LI Sophia | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | COLIC LANI | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | YU Xintong | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 34 | NICOLETTI Thea | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 35 | LI Audrey | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 36 | DVOIRIS Maya | 1% | 13% | 43% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | PAN Samantha | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | TAN Shouyin | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 2% |
| 39 | BHANGOO Paloma | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 40 | KULKARNI myra | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | TANG Amelia | 3% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | KIM Audrey | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 43 | OTAEGI Elorri | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 44 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | YANG Byanca | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 46 | WANG Ellen | 19% | 54% | 23% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | SARANGAN Ovia | 11% | 37% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | LEBURU NagaVaishnavi | - | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 49 | IRELAND Moira | 8% | 36% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | LIN Avery | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 51 | PAWAR Sanvi | 8% | 38% | 40% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 53 | VARADHARAJ Ahaana | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 54 | DONG Nancy | 21% | 45% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LIU Madeleine | 51% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | YU-TAN Claire | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 57 | LEE Adelaide | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 59 | CHU Lauren | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 60 | YIN Anthea | 66% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 25% | 46% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 61 | FISCHER Evangeline | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.