San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 45% |
2 | LIU Ariana | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 59% |
3 | CHAN Mila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 40% | |
3 | LI Alice | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 46% |
5 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
6 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
7 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 21% | 2% |
8 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 10% |
9 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
10 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
11 | TAO Ann | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 59% |
12 | TAI Taphanie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
13 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 16% |
14 | PEDERSEN Haley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 13% |
15 | ZHANG Queeny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
16 | JIN Jada Y | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
17 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
18 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 64% | 20% | 2% |
19 | LEE Zoe E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% | 7% | |
20 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 18% |
21 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
22 | ZHU Yunyao | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
23 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | - |
24 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 43% | 7% |
25 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% |
26 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
27 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 12% | |
28 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
29 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
30 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% | 6% | - |
31 | LI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
32 | COLIC LANI | 100% | 78% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
33 | YU Xintong | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
34 | NICOLETTI Thea | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 6% | - |
35 | LI Audrey | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
36 | DVOIRIS Maya | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
37 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
38 | TAN Shouyin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
39 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | KULKARNI myra | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
40 | TANG Amelia | 100% | 97% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
42 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
43 | OTAEGI Elorri | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
44 | YUEN Kaitlyn | 100% | 86% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
45 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | |
46 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 81% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
47 | SARANGAN Ovia | 100% | 89% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
48 | LEBURU NagaVaishnavi | 100% | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
49 | IRELAND Moira | 100% | 92% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
50 | LIN Avery | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
51 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 92% | 54% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
53 | VARADHARAJ Ahaana | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
54 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
54 | DONG Nancy | 100% | 79% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - |
56 | LIU Madeleine | 100% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | YU-TAN Claire | 100% | 62% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
57 | LEE Adelaide | 100% | 79% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
59 | CHU Lauren | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
60 | YIN Anthea | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
61 | WARBURTON Eleanor | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
61 | FISCHER Evangeline | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.