San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PENG Charlotte | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
2 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
3 | XIA Isabella | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
3 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
5 | THERON Zoe | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
6 | LI Joy | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
7 | CHAN Ella | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
8 | IDANAWANG Madison | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
9 | LUO Miranda | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 33% |
9 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
11 | YU Sophie | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
12 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
13 | ZHENG Zoe | - | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
14 | CHO Karis | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
15 | GUAN Adeline | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 48% | 20% |
16 | ZHANG Queeny | - | 5% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
17 | ZHU Yunyao | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
17 | WU Chingfei Amber | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
19 | PEDERSEN Haley | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
20 | GOEL Riyana | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
21 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
22 | HSIAO Ariya | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
23 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
24 | LI Chelsea | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
25 | HUGHES Bailey | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
26 | WANG Doreen | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
27 | FANG Kelervia | 1% | 12% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
28 | DVOIRIS Maya | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
29 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 2% |
30 | IDANAWANG Allison | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
31 | LIU Isabelle | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
32 | DING Madison | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
33 | KULKARNI myra | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | YANG Stephanie | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
35 | BEOHAR Anika | 8% | 45% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
36 | LI Audrey | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
37 | HART Brennan | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
38 | BHANGOO Paloma | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
39 | OTAEGI Elorri | 11% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
40 | OSENENKO Mia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | MALIUANAG Aerin | 36% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | TAI Taphanie | 14% | 42% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.