San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PENG Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
2 | HOVAGHIMIAN Fira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
3 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
3 | TIKHONOVA Vasilisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
5 | THERON Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% |
6 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% |
7 | CHAN Ella | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 2% |
8 | IDANAWANG Madison | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
9 | LUO Miranda | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
9 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
11 | YU Sophie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
12 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
13 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 7% |
14 | CHO Karis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
15 | GUAN Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 20% |
16 | ZHANG Queeny | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 7% | 1% |
17 | ZHU Yunyao | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
17 | WU Chingfei Amber | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
19 | PEDERSEN Haley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% |
20 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
21 | MATTUPALLI Ashwika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
22 | HSIAO Ariya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
23 | TIKHONOVA Sofia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
24 | LI Chelsea | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% |
25 | HUGHES Bailey | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
26 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
27 | FANG Kelervia | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - |
28 | DVOIRIS Maya | 100% | 88% | 56% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
29 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 20% | 2% |
30 | IDANAWANG Allison | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
31 | LIU Isabelle | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
32 | DING Madison | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | KULKARNI myra | 100% | 67% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
34 | YANG Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
35 | BEOHAR Anika | 100% | 92% | 47% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
36 | LI Audrey | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
37 | HART Brennan | 100% | 78% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | BHANGOO Paloma | 100% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
39 | OTAEGI Elorri | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
40 | OSENENKO Mia | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
41 | MALIUANAG Aerin | 100% | 64% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
42 | TAI Taphanie | 100% | 86% | 43% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.