UC Berkeley - Berkeley, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TSANG Matthew Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 2 | MEINHOLD Li | V V V | 0.0 | 0 | - | |
| 3 | NA Rongyao Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 3 | SUN Chienyu | V V V | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 | |
| 5 | UZGIRIS Kovas | V V V V V | V | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 6 | GOLDADE Luke | V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 7 | MIETTINEN Pyry | V V V V V | V | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 8 | SUN Tien-Lan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 9 | CHEN Aaron Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 10 | WANG Kyra | D | D | 0.1 | 0 | -0.1 |
| 11 | NGUYEN Eric | D V V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 12 | LI Frank Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 13 | YANKOPOULOS Elise | V D V D V | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 14 | DENSON Amenia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 15 | FRAGALA Michael Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 16 | JIANG Runfeng | D | V V | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 17 | WESLING Nathan | V V V V D | D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 18 | LAU Ivan | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - | |
| 19 | MAXON Blake | D V V D V | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 | |
| 20 | LUO Kylie | D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 21 | BENAVIDEZ Victor | V | 0.0 | 1 | +1.0 | |
| 22 | SPEER Mila | D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 23 | NUEVE Emmanuelle Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 24 | LAM Kellan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 25 | HELPIO Olivia Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 26 | REKSOSAMUDRA Ashley | D D D V V | 0.5 | 2 | +1.5 | |
| 27 | JAIN Advik | D D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | LEE Seungmi Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 29 | NGUYEN Bao Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 30 | LEE Jaehyeon Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 31 | JEON Emily | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 32 | MUSS Josephine Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 33 | LASCH Victoria | D D D D V | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 | |
| 34 | KOBAYASHI Taiyo Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 35 | LUONG Quynh Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 36 | THORNE Lucas Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 37 | CURRY Aidan Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 38 | JAGGAR Rylyn | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 39 | DALAHI Joyce Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 40 | NGUYEN Angelina | D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.