San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHOU Joi | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
| 2 | LI Joy | - | - | - | - | - | 10% | 89% |
| 3 | NEUMANN Erika | - | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% |
| 3 | XIA Isabella | - | - | - | 4% | 31% | 65% | |
| 5 | CHAN Mila | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 80% |
| 6 | KENSICKI Phoebe | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% |
| 7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 21% | |
| 8 | WANG Doreen | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
| 9 | LI Audrey | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 13% | |
| 10 | LEE Abigail | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 11 | AHN Hayley | - | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 27% | 3% |
| 12 | LIN Avery | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 11% | 1% |
| 13 | PAN Samantha | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 14 | THOTA Akira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 45% | 13% |
| 15 | TEWARI Amaira | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 34% | 3% |
| 16 | YU Xintong | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 17 | LIU Mia | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 1% |
| 18 | IRELAND Moira | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 19 | HSU Rachel | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 20 | ZALTZMAN Maya | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 21 | NICOLETTI Thea | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | PAWAR Sanvi | 2% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | ARYA Leela | - | 3% | 20% | 47% | 28% | 3% | |
| 24 | KIM Ines | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | LUO Olivia | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 26 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 36% | 2% |
| 27 | KIM Audrey | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 26% | 3% |
| 28 | CHENG Audrey | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 29 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 30 | KIM Natalie | - | - | 5% | 27% | 52% | 15% | |
| 31 | JOESUF Thea | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 32 | WANG Ellen | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 33 | YANG Byanca | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | ZHANG Annabelle | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 36 | KHANAL Sarah | - | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 37 | PARK Seojeong | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | |
| 38 | KO Adeline | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 39 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | DONG Nancy | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 41 | HOM Emma | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | THERIOT Reagan | 6% | 33% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | GUO Jianing | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 45 | HONDA Emi | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 46 | LIU Madeleine | 8% | 44% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | YANG Claire | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 47 | STERNAD Pia | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 49 | KAIMAN Tabby | 36% | 46% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LAI Olivia | 4% | 26% | 45% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Rylie | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 52 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 24% | 47% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 54 | YU-TAN Claire | 1% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 55 | TANG Clementine | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | STOCK Nina | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 57 | YIN Anthea | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | GRANT Alayah | < 1% | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 59 | JUSON Ianne | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 60 | FENG Sophia | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.