San Joaquin County Fairgrounds - Stockton, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHOU Joi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
2 | LI Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% |
3 | NEUMANN Erika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 57% |
3 | XIA Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | |
5 | CHAN Mila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% |
6 | KENSICKI Phoebe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
7 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 21% | |
8 | WANG Doreen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% |
9 | LI Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 13% | |
10 | LEE Abigail | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
11 | AHN Hayley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 30% | 3% |
12 | LIN Avery | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | 1% |
13 | PAN Samantha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
14 | THOTA Akira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 13% |
15 | TEWARI Amaira | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 37% | 3% |
16 | YU Xintong | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
17 | LIU Mia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% | 1% |
18 | IRELAND Moira | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
19 | HSU Rachel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
20 | ZALTZMAN Maya | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
21 | NICOLETTI Thea | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% |
22 | PAWAR Sanvi | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
23 | ARYA Leela | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | 3% | |
24 | KIM Ines | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 5% | - | |
25 | LUO Olivia | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 7% | - | |
26 | ARUNKISHORE Dakshina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 38% | 2% |
27 | KIM Audrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 29% | 3% |
28 | CHENG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 7% |
29 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
30 | KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 15% | |
31 | JOESUF Thea | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
32 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
33 | YANG Byanca | 100% | 91% | 58% | 19% | 2% | - | |
34 | LAM Dorris Yandor | 100% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - | |
35 | ZHANG Annabelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
36 | KHANAL Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 6% | - |
37 | PARK Seojeong | 100% | 71% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
38 | KO Adeline | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
39 | BASTUNAS Marissa | 100% | 90% | 56% | 18% | 2% | - | |
40 | DONG Nancy | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
41 | HOM Emma | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
42 | THERIOT Reagan | 100% | 94% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
43 | GUO Jianing | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | CHEUNG Carabelle | 100% | 89% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
45 | HONDA Emi | 100% | 68% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
46 | LIU Madeleine | 100% | 92% | 49% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
47 | YANG Claire | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
47 | STERNAD Pia | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
49 | KAIMAN Tabby | 100% | 64% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
50 | LAI Olivia | 100% | 96% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
51 | KIM Rylie | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
52 | ERDMAN-SINESIO Sophia | 100% | 76% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
53 | VALOUEVA Katerina | 100% | 96% | 66% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
54 | YU-TAN Claire | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
55 | TANG Clementine | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
56 | STOCK Nina | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
57 | YIN Anthea | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
57 | GRANT Alayah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | |
59 | JUSON Ianne | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
60 | FENG Sophia | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.