Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WOOD Alexander W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 37% | 6% |
2 | GROSS Stephen R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | |
3 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
5 | WOOD Ben | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
6 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 30% | |
7 | DORFMAN Mitchell (Mitch) J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 21% | |
8 | GUERRERO Gonzalo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 5% | |
9 | THURMAN Allison L. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 40% | 9% | 1% | |
10 | MERRITT Elizabeth (Badger) E. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
11 | MILLIGAN Bruce C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 9% | |
12 | WANG Jim | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
13 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 21% | 1% | |
14 | MYERS Kenneth | 100% | 94% | 51% | 7% | - | - | |
15 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 35% | 4% | |
16 | SELTZER Eve | 100% | 99% | 70% | 25% | 4% | - | |
17 | CHANDLEE Thomas | 100% | 99% | 86% | 29% | 4% | - | |
18 | CHECKEYE Daniel J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | - |
19 | CONDIFF Allessandro D. | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
20 | REICHMAN Marsha E. | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
21 | ARANGO PINEDO Catalina | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
22 | SMITH Steven | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
23 | SCHOEPFLE Carla | 100% | 94% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
24 | CHANDLEE Richard (rick) | 100% | 97% | 81% | 51% | 21% | 5% | 1% |
25 | NESTERUK Hope | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | |
26 | BERGEN Kevin | 100% | 62% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.