Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOLLIS Sean | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
2 | ZHAO Brian | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
3 | BLACK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
3 | HOU Gaven | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
5 | LEE Charles T | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
6 | BAKSHI Aman | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
7 | HOLMES Alexiy | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
8 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
9 | HART-SYED declan | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
10 | REYES Yannik | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | < 1% | - |
11 | DIAZ Gabriel | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
12 | PECK Quinn | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
13 | CHEN kenneth | 1% | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
14 | SENANI Arjun | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
15 | ABRAMKIN Tim | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
16 | KOVACS Harrison | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
17 | ZHANG GAVIN J | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
18 | ZHAO Ryan | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
19 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
20 | LINDEMANN Marc | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
21 | XU Brian | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
22 | XU Nathan | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
23 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
24 | ONIK Ari N. | - | 3% | 15% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
25 | TAM Kyle | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
26 | WOODCOCK Henry | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
27 | YANG David H. | 5% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
28 | JIN Andy | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
29 | OH Joshua | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
30 | SION Andrew | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
31 | GONZALEZ DE COSIO ALVAREZ Iker | - | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
32 | COUAILLIER Leo | 22% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
33 | FOGELSON Hugh | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | - |
34 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | LEE Aeden | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | BERNARD Jonathan | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
37 | BLACK Henry | 10% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
38 | SMITH Colin | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | BERETICH Brian | 4% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
40 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 7% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | ZHENG Austin | 13% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
42 | WANG Xicheng | 2% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.