Mission Fencing Center - Rocky Point, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
2 | ZHAO Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
3 | BLACK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% |
3 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
5 | LEE Charles T | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
6 | BAKSHI Aman | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
7 | HOLMES Alexiy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
8 | ZAPPALA Nikolai | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
9 | HART-SYED declan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
10 | REYES Yannik | 100% | 79% | 40% | 11% | 2% | < 1% | - |
11 | DIAZ Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
12 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
13 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
14 | SENANI Arjun | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
15 | ABRAMKIN Tim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 15% |
16 | KOVACS Harrison | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
17 | ZHANG GAVIN J | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
18 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
19 | BRAVO ORTEGA Estéfano | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
20 | LINDEMANN Marc | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
21 | XU Brian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
22 | XU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 29% | 6% |
23 | CHOU-ESTEBAN Pau | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
24 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
25 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% |
26 | WOODCOCK Henry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% |
27 | YANG David H. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
28 | JIN Andy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% |
29 | OH Joshua | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
30 | SION Andrew | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
31 | GONZALEZ DE COSIO ALVAREZ Iker | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 7% | 1% |
32 | COUAILLIER Leo | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | - |
34 | LINDEMANN Conrad | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
35 | LEE Aeden | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | BERNARD Jonathan | 100% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
37 | BLACK Henry | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | SMITH Colin | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
39 | BERETICH Brian | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 100% | 93% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
41 | ZHENG Austin | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | WANG Xicheng | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 14% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.