Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | - | 8% | 92% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 44% | 7% |
| 3 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 3 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 5 | QU ZHUOYING | - | - | 4% | 20% | 46% | 29% | |
| 6 | AI Amy | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 7 | STERR Isabella M. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 8 | SUN Hanya | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 9 | YIN Julia | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 10 | LEACH Meka A. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 11 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
| 12 | WITTER Catherine A. | 1% | 7% | 29% | 44% | 18% | 2% | |
| 13 | SU Evelyn | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 9% | |
| 14 | DONG Ava | - | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 16 | CAFASSO Natalya | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% | - |
| 19 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% | |
| 20 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | - | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
| 21 | YAO Melinda | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 22 | QIU Emily | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 23 | XIA Amy | 1% | 7% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | YUMIACO Nylah | - | 4% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | AGAON Evelyn | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | HUANG Lanlan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 27 | TOLSMA Chloe | - | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 9% |
| 28 | BECKMAN Ana | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | SHIV Avni | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 34% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHU Serene M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 31 | PULLEN Ayah | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MIRZA Annoshae | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 34 | LAM Amelia Paige | 2% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 36 | SYKES Elynor | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | FREEMAN Kate | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | SOIN Kaira | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MENDOZA zoie | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | LEE Camilla | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | WANG Ziqi | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | CARRIER Meredith | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | WANG Angelina | 6% | 49% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | NGUYEN Ella | 34% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SATNIC Lauren | 5% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 19% | 43% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SON Erica | 6% | 22% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ANDERSON Melody | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | HSIU Elizabeth | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | WANG Victoria | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BERIASHVILI Catherine | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LINCOLN Clare | 85% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.