Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | 7% |
| 3 | SHARMA Sanvi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% |
| 3 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
| 5 | QU ZHUOYING | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | |
| 6 | AI Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 7 | STERR Isabella M. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 8 | SUN Hanya | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 56% | 18% |
| 10 | LEACH Meka A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
| 11 | LEE REGINA | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 12 | WITTER Catherine A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 20% | 2% | |
| 13 | SU Evelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% | |
| 14 | DONG Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 16 | CAFASSO Natalya | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | LEE Olivia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 10% | - |
| 19 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
| 20 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 21 | YAO Melinda | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | QIU Emily | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | - |
| 23 | XIA Amy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | YUMIACO Nylah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 25 | AGAON Evelyn | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 26 | HUANG Lanlan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 27 | TOLSMA Chloe | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 28 | BECKMAN Ana | 100% | 77% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | SHIV Avni | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | 1% |
| 30 | ZHU Serene M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 31 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 32 | MIRZA Annoshae | 100% | 91% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | SPRINGER Sierra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 34 | LAM Amelia Paige | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 36 | SYKES Elynor | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 38 | FREEMAN Kate | 100% | 94% | 65% | 23% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | SOIN Kaira | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | MENDOZA zoie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 41 | LEE Camilla | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | WANG Ziqi | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | CARRIER Meredith | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | WANG Angelina | 100% | 94% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 45 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | SATNIC Lauren | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | SON Erica | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 49 | ANDERSON Melody | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | HSIU Elizabeth | 100% | 80% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | WANG Victoria | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 52 | BERIASHVILI Catherine | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | LINCOLN Clare | 100% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.