Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | PARK Lina | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | SHMUKLER Maria | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 3 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 5 | DONG Emily | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | LEE Jeemin | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | PINEDA jade luna | V V V D V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | PARK Zena | D V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | OWENS Elise | V V V V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 10 | MOORE Addisyn | V V D V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 11 | IQBAL Mariam | V V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 12 | KUTATELADZE Anna | D V V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 13 | CHOI Jordan | V D V V V D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 14 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | D V V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 15 | MEITZEN Havah | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | D V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 17 | KATS Ekaterina | V D V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 18 | ROTHMAN Rebecca | V D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 19 | KIM Sophia | V D D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 20 | LIU Joanna | D V D V V D | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 20 | BALIN Julia | V D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 22 | BLANKS Campbell | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 23 | FERRONE Gianna | V D V D D | D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | D V V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 25 | HAILU Raena | D D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | VENZON Makena Jane | D V D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | V V D D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | PHAN Logan | V V D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 29 | TAN Isabella | D D D V D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 30 | LEE Katelyn | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | IBRAHIM Yara | D D D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | CHENG Emma | D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 33 | MILLER Vai | V D D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 34 | LUEKEN Adelina | D V D D D | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 35 | CARDINAL Elise | D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | WANG hannah | D D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 37 | BRUCE Sevi | D D D D D D | D | 2.3 | 0 | -2.3 |
| 38 | JOSEPH Rachel | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 38 | BRUCE Lana | D D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 40 | CHEN Mikayla | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.