Myrtle Beach Sports Center - Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PARK Lina | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
2 | SHMUKLER Maria | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
3 | VIJAYAKUMAR Diya | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 40% |
3 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
5 | DONG Emily | - | - | 5% | 26% | 49% | 20% | |
6 | LEE Jeemin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 42% | 11% |
7 | PINEDA jade luna | - | - | 2% | 16% | 49% | 33% | |
8 | PARK Zena | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
9 | OWENS Elise | - | - | 2% | 14% | 47% | 38% | |
10 | MOORE Addisyn | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 46% | 8% |
11 | IQBAL Mariam | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
12 | KUTATELADZE Anna | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
13 | CHOI Jordan | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
14 | ARMSTRONG Olivia | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 10% |
15 | MEITZEN Havah | - | 2% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
16 | RIEGERT-JOHNSON Simone | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 2% |
17 | KATS Ekaterina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 40% | 20% | 3% |
18 | ROTHMAN Rebecca | 4% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 5% | - | |
19 | KIM Sophia | 1% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | LIU Joanna | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
20 | BALIN Julia | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
22 | BLANKS Campbell | 5% | 34% | 41% | 17% | 2% | - | |
23 | FERRONE Gianna | 1% | 13% | 37% | 36% | 11% | 1% | |
24 | SIMANJUNTAK Jocelyn | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | - | |
25 | HAILU Raena | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | - |
26 | VENZON Makena Jane | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | - |
27 | SHARAIEVSKA Mariia | 22% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
28 | PHAN Logan | 13% | 41% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
29 | TAN Isabella | 2% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 6% | - | |
30 | LEE Katelyn | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
31 | IBRAHIM Yara | 1% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 2% | - |
32 | CHENG Emma | 17% | 43% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | |
33 | MILLER Vai | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
34 | LUEKEN Adelina | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
35 | CARDINAL Elise | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - | |
36 | WANG hannah | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
37 | BRUCE Sevi | < 1% | 16% | 46% | 32% | 6% | - | - |
38 | JOSEPH Rachel | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
38 | BRUCE Lana | 1% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
40 | CHEN Mikayla | 76% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.