Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | HOLZ Daniel | V V V D V D | V V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
2 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | D D V V D V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
3 | HU Christopher | V V D V V D | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
3 | DUCKETT Myles | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
5 | TAO Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V V | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
6 | SU Landon | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
7 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
8 | ANDRES Michael | V V D V D V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
9 | ANAND Rohan | V V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 6 | +2.6 |
10 | SHINCHUK Daniel | V V V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
13 | OSENAR Sam | V D V V V V | V V D | 1.3 | 5 | +3.7 |
14 | PI Alexander | V D D V V V | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
15 | BERA Enzo | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
16 | PATEL Rayn | D D D V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
17 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
18 | CLARK Gabriel | V V V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
19 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
20 | CHOW William T. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
21 | JOO Jeein | D V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
22 | HUANG Alex F. | V V D V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
23 | LIN Philip T. | V D V D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
24 | TRAN Dash | D D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
25 | GERSTMANN Max T. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
26 | MEHAN Nicholas | D V V D D V | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
27 | KERCHER Alexander | V V D D V D | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
28 | BONETTI Brayden | V V D D V D | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
29 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | V D V D D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
30 | SKIMEL Michael | D V D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
31 | HOLZ Lucas | V V D V D D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
32 | KALPATHY Rohit | D D D V V D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
33 | CHEN Lohen | D D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
34 | CHEN Jonathan | D D V V V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
35 | WITCZAK Mateus | V D V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
36 | GONG zihao | V V V D D D | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
37 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | D D V D D V | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
38 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | V D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
39 | ZHU Kevin | V V D D D D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
40 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | D V D D V D | D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
41 | GUREVICH Benjamin | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
42 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | D V V D D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
43 | KURILO Michael | D V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | OH Aster | D V V D D D | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
45 | GUYDOUK Alexey | V D D D D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
46 | YAN William | D D V V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
47 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | D D D D V D | D | 4.2 | 1 | -3.2 |
48 | GONG ziqian | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
49 | SAMMI Mukul | D D D V D D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
50 | JIANG Jeremy | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
51 | ATWOOD Griffin | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
52 | WOLITZER Gage | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
53 | ANAND Rishab | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
54 | NORTON Benjamin | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
55 | CIACCIA Luca | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.