Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HOLZ Daniel | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
2 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
3 | HU Christopher | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
3 | DUCKETT Myles | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
5 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
6 | SU Landon | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
7 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
8 | ANDRES Michael | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
9 | ANAND Rohan | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
10 | SHINCHUK Daniel | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
12 | ERMAKOV Semeon | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
13 | OSENAR Sam | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | - |
14 | PI Alexander | 3% | 21% | 50% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
15 | BERA Enzo | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
16 | PATEL Rayn | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
17 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
18 | CLARK Gabriel | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
19 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
20 | CHOW William T. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
21 | JOO Jeein | - | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 34% | 14% |
22 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
23 | LIN Philip T. | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
24 | TRAN Dash | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
25 | GERSTMANN Max T. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 34% | 40% | 14% |
26 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | - | 5% | 25% | 44% | 26% |
27 | KERCHER Alexander | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
28 | BONETTI Brayden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
29 | SUBRAMANIAM Oliver C. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
30 | SKIMEL Michael | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
31 | HOLZ Lucas | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
32 | KALPATHY Rohit | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
33 | CHEN Lohen | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
34 | CHEN Jonathan | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
35 | WITCZAK Mateus | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
36 | GONG zihao | 8% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
38 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
39 | ZHU Kevin | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
40 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
41 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
42 | YERRAMILLI Tejas | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
43 | KURILO Michael | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
44 | OH Aster | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
45 | GUYDOUK Alexey | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
46 | YAN William | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
47 | MEDVINSKY Daniel | - | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 8% |
48 | GONG ziqian | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
49 | SAMMI Mukul | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
50 | JIANG Jeremy | 10% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
51 | ATWOOD Griffin | 11% | 37% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
52 | WOLITZER Gage | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
53 | ANAND Rishab | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
54 | NORTON Benjamin | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
55 | CIACCIA Luca | 19% | 57% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.