Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
| 2 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 3 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 5 | BAE EMMELINE | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
| 6 | ATLURI Sara V. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 7 | DAHLKEMPER Audrey G. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 8 | HUANG Sharon | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 14% |
| 10 | PATEL Riya | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | HAYES Grace Y. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 12 | DARINGA Arianna | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 13 | BOIS Adele | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
| 14 | VESTEL Mira B. | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 15 | OWENS Celine A. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 16 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 17 | DESAI Maya D. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 18 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 19 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
| 20 | XI Shining | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 21 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 2% | 9% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 22 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 45% | 18% |
| 23 | SKAGGS Natalie M. | - | 3% | 13% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 5% |
| 24 | CHIANG Emily | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 25 | SU Emma | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Elsabella Y. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 27 | BEATY Carlee | 2% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | PLONKA Kaley V. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 29 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% |
| 30 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 31 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TRAN Thya K. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 34 | RHIE Lena | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 35 | IQBAL Sulphia | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | LIN Selena | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | LU Amy | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | HU Allison C. | 3% | 14% | 30% | 31% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | MCMAHON Byronie | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Fangping(Martha) | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | KRYLOVA Valery | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 5% |
| 44 | DONDERIS Hannah E. | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 45 | OSBORN Charlotte | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
| 46 | WU Cici | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HUANG Tina | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Amelia M. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | HOLMES Emma | 18% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | LU Yi Lin | 6% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Grace | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 52 | NEIBART Fiona | 4% | 17% | 31% | 29% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LEZHAVA Leah | 11% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | KITTLE Lauren | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Shengyao | 9% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | GLUCK Ariel | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 57 | DREYER Nadia S. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 58 | WANG Jianning | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 59 | HURST Kennedy | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | DILLE Carolina G. | 10% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | JEAN Olympe G. | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 62 | NGUYEN Ella | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 63 | GRINBERG Aliya | 4% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 64 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 65 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 66 | CHAN Chloe | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 68 | DIFILIPPO Julia | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 27% | 43% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.