Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 2 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 3 | STONE Hava S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 3 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 13% |
| 5 | BAE EMMELINE | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 6 | ATLURI Sara V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
| 7 | DAHLKEMPER Audrey G. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 8 | HUANG Sharon | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 1% |
| 9 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 10 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | HAYES Grace Y. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 12 | DARINGA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 59% | 18% |
| 13 | BOIS Adele | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 14 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% |
| 15 | OWENS Celine A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 12% |
| 16 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 17 | DESAI Maya D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 31% | 7% |
| 18 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 19 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 4% |
| 20 | XI Shining | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 10% |
| 21 | BAKER Audrey C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 66% | 32% | 7% |
| 22 | BENOIT Adelaide L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 18% |
| 23 | SKAGGS Natalie M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 57% | 25% | 5% |
| 24 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | SU Emma | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Elsabella Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% |
| 27 | BEATY Carlee | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 28 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 30 | PANIGRAHI Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | SHIH Christina | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | YERRAMILLI Kavya | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TRAN Thya K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 34 | RHIE Lena | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 35 | IQBAL Sulphia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 36 | LIN Selena | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | LU Amy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 38 | HU Allison C. | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 22% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | MCMAHON Byronie | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 40 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | PANIGRAHI Emersen | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 42 | CHEN Fangping(Martha) | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 43 | KRYLOVA Valery | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 56% | 24% | 5% |
| 44 | DONDERIS Hannah E. | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 45 | OSBORN Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
| 46 | WU Cici | 100% | 66% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HUANG Tina | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | BAKER Amelia M. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | LU Yi Lin | 100% | 94% | 65% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | CHEN Grace | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 52 | NEIBART Fiona | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | LEZHAVA Leah | 100% | 89% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 53 | KITTLE Lauren | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | LIU Shengyao | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | GLUCK Ariel | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 57 | DREYER Nadia S. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 58 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 59 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
| 60 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 61 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | NGUYEN Ella | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 63 | GRINBERG Aliya | 100% | 96% | 77% | 45% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 64 | GRAJALES Emily K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 65 | ZENG Xiaoyi | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 66 | CHAN Chloe | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | LITVAK-HINENZON Michaela | 100% | 60% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 68 | DIFILIPPO Julia | 100% | 79% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 69 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 100% | 73% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.