Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PARK Faith K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% |
| 2 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 3 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 14% |
| 3 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 58% |
| 5 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 6 | O'DONNELL Amanda A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% |
| 7 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 8 | FALLON Kyle R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 9 | WANG Karen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
| 10 | MALDONADO Pilar I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 19% |
| 11 | GABERKORN Nadia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 12 | ZAFFT Tatiana M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 13 | CHIN Isabella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 18% |
| 14 | MEHROTRA Anya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 13% |
| 15 | TYLER Syd | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% |
| 16 | PARTE Isabella B. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 53% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 17 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 39% |
| 18 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 18% | |
| 19 | DANIEL Olivia | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
| 20 | MILLETTE Marie Frederique | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 21% |
| 21 | NING Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 34% | 5% |
| 22 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 23 | ZHENG Ava | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 24 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 23% | |
| 25 | LEUNG Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 41% | |
| 26 | LAN Alice S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 6% | |
| 27 | SMITH Grace L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% |
| 28 | BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 29 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 30 | PALANSKI Cate | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 31 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 52% | 17% |
| 32 | KIM Erika S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% |
| 34 | REID Sobia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
| 35 | LEE Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 55% | 13% |
| 36 | RUNIONS Emersyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | 5% |
| 37 | WU Amelia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
| 38 | CHEN Zhengnan(Janet) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 39 | LOWENSTEIN Penelope J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 40 | ZHANG Tina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 41 | MUCSI Angela Lilla | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% | |
| 42 | KETKAR Mallika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 13% | |
| 43 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% |
| 44 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% |
| 45 | BURN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 46 | YU Nicole J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 47 | SON Katherine (Injee) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 47 | SHEN Stephanie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | KOKES Ava | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 50 | WANG Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 51 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 52 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 53 | WANG anne | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 2% |
| 54 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 55 | MACHULSKY Leehi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | |
| 56 | ZHU Heidi | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 17% | |
| 57 | XIAO Ruien | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 27% | 5% | |
| 58 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | - | |
| 59 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 60 | LIU Christina A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 46% | 8% |
| 61 | AHUJA Arianna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 62 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 3% |
| 63 | REMEZA Alissa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% |
| 64 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 65% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | LI Bingqi | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 66 | LU Shiqi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 67 | KIM Zoe L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | REID Anousheh | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 69 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 33% | 7% |
| 69 | SHUM Jessica | 100% | 95% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 71 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 72 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 15% | 1% | |
| 73 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
| 74 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 75 | PALMER Amelia C. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 76 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 77 | CHOI Eunice | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 7% | - | |
| 78 | GREGSTON Lailia B. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 79 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 38% | 9% | 1% |
| 81 | JIN Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 81 | XING Carol | 100% | 93% | 70% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 83 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 12% | 1% |
| 84 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 78% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 85 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
| 87 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 88 | BAKSA Frances E. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 88 | XUAN Nicole J. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 90 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 91 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 92 | WU ALLYSON | 100% | 94% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | ZHANG Victoria R. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 94 | BECCHINA Olivia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 95 | DARANOUVONG Logan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 95 | JOSEPH mikayla | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 97 | LESSNE Lauren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 98 | CALDERA Lexi I. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 28% | 5% | |
| 99 | WANG Nora | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 12% | |
| 100 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 101 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 102 | LEE Yedda | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 102 | YAO KATHARINE | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
| 102 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 105 | WU Fan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 106 | JAMES Josephine | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 107 | PADHYE Tanishka | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 23% | 3% |
| 108 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 109 | MUELLER Emma M. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 110 | YIN Julia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 111 | HUNTER Madison | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 112 | DILLE Carolina G. | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 113 | ZHENG Linden | 100% | 75% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 114 | SHAH Chloe | 100% | 53% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 115 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 116 | RAZA Nadia A. | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 117 | HU Chelsea | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 118 | ELSTON Sophia | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 120 | HESS Heidi J. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 121 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 122 | LUO Ashley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% |
| 123 | MAO Amy | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 124 | HU Yutong | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 125 | GREGORY Aleksandra | 100% | 98% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 126 | PAN Iris | 100% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 127 | XU Jessica | 100% | 60% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 128 | GLICK Nina | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 129 | GLASER Drew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
| 130 | GUAN Dorothy | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 2% | - |
| 131 | LEE Yoonseo | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 132 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 133 | FRIEDLANDER Sarah | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 134 | BLIN Margaux J. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 135 | LEE Natasha | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 136 | ODOM Megan A. | 100% | 60% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 137 | ZHANG Nicole | 100% | 70% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 138 | DENG Annie | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 139 | NELSON Grace E. | 100% | 89% | 39% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 139 | MA ELISE | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 141 | LIU Nicole | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 142 | LEE Rachel | 100% | 87% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 143 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 144 | SATNIC Jenni | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 145 | POPA Catherine | 100% | 86% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 146 | FRYDRYK Sydney K. | 100% | 92% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 147 | KNOEPFFLER ANDREA V. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 148 | KAUSHISH Sara | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 149 | KIM Jayna | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 150 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 150 | MACEY Hadley | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 152 | BARRETT Elisabeth | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 153 | PRIHODKO Nina | 100% | 69% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 153 | DREFKE Sigrid | 100% | 57% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 155 | NGUYEN Tallulah | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 156 | LI Vivian | 100% | 84% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.