DFA - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | WENDLER Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | |
2 | LI Jett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 28% | |
3 | SCHEUERMANN Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 63% | |
3 | TSANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | |
5 | PEGRAM Rafferty | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
6 | BECKER Ethan | 100% | 96% | 71% | 28% | 4% | - | - | |
7 | MIETTINEN Pyry | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 8% | - | |
8 | BHANOT Arjun | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% | - |
9 | BHATT Morgane | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% |
10 | GOLDADE A Luke | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 24% | |
11 | GUO Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 12% | - | |
12 | WEI Winston | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 4% | - | |
13 | FALLON Thomas | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 15% | 2% | - | |
14 | VAN Tyson | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | - | |
15 | TON Kalista | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
16 | MAZZA Daniel | 100% | 95% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
17 | PETERSON Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 6% |
18 | AHN Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 1% | - |
19 | BANDEGAN Audreen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 12% | - | |
20 | BOYNTON Alex | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
21 | WALKER Adam | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | |
22 | BHATT Jay | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 2% | |
23 | MACRAE Calvin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 32% | 2% | |
24 | YANKOPOULOS Elise | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 47% | 18% | 3% | - |
25 | FALLON Peter | 100% | 89% | 50% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
26 | HONG Olivia | 100% | 97% | 76% | 32% | 3% | - | - | |
27 | HART Brennan | 100% | 76% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
28 | DIVATE Saanvi | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - | |
29 | CRIDLAND Trent | 100% | 92% | 60% | 19% | 1% | - | - | |
30 | ZANDER Maxx | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
31 | REKSOSAMUDRA Ashley | 100% | 73% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
32 | HELPIO Olivia | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
33 | VIZCARRA Nathan | 100% | 82% | 40% | 8% | - | - | - | |
34 | HUNTINGDALE Dane | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
35 | WONG Jessica | 100% | 52% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - | |
36 | DOBBINS Mateo | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.