DFA - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | - | - | 8% | 40% | 51% | |
2 | CANNAERT Ethan | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 13% | |
3 | HELGE James | - | 1% | 20% | 56% | 23% | |
3 | HICKS Zachary | - | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
5 | LIN Andrew | 1% | 11% | 37% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
6 | SWANSON Carl | 1% | 12% | 35% | 38% | 14% | |
7 | VAN Tyson | 31% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | |
8 | HEINS Dylan | - | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% | |
9 | KENNY Oliver | - | - | 5% | 28% | 47% | 19% |
10 | CHEUNG Clara | 17% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
11 | MITTMAN Lela | 9% | 35% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
12 | TAGKOPOULOS Pagkratios | 2% | 48% | 45% | 5% | - | |
13 | LUO Kylie | 63% | 35% | 3% | - | - | |
14 | TALATAM Arnav | 5% | 35% | 51% | 9% | - | - |
15 | DEMONTIGNY Ronen | 22% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | |
16 | CHE Yi | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.