March NAC

Div III Men's Saber

Sunday, March 3, 2019 at 3:00 PM

Cleveland, OH - Cleveland, OH, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 GILLIGAN Wolff V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.1 6 +1.9
2 NG Jonathan H. V V V V D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
3 PAN Andrew W. V V D V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
3 CHEN Oscar V V V V V D V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
5 OWENS William V V V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
6 STONE Jack V. V V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
7 YANG Richard V V D D V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
8 REYES Xavier M. D V V D D D V V V V D 4.6 2 -2.6
9 CHAMBERS Amir E. V V V V V V V V D 5.0 6 +1.0
10 WUN William V V V V V V V V V D 4.5 6 +1.5
11 LIU David J. V V V V V D V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
12 GREENBAUM Ian L. V V D V V V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
13 JEAN Noe T. V V V D V V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
14 HUANG Eric V V D V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
15 DIACOS Jordan D V V V V V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
16 CHAN Daniel V V V V D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
17 DESAI Drewv D. V V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
18 MENG Xiang V V V V V V V V D 4.4 6 +1.6
19 CHANG Colin S. V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
20 MYERS Kaleb S. D V V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 VOCHOSKA Aidan F. V V V V V D V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
22 QUAN Nicholas V V D V V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
22 ALTIRS Alexander V V D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
24 JARAMILLO Tobias L. V V V V D V V V D 5.3 5 -0.3
25 BRUSIE Christopher R. D V V V V V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
26 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. D V V V V V V D 4.0 4 -
27 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. V D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
28 ZHOU Justin V D V V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
29 RABINKOV Anthony V V D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
30 PARK Collin D. V V V D D D V V D 4.8 3 -1.8
31 GOODWIN Keith D. D V D D V D V V D 3.1 2 -1.1
32 HENNICKE Michael G. V D D D V D V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
33 WESLER Logan A. V V V V V V D 2.9 6 +3.1
34 RESHEIDAT Malik V V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
35 HAMMERSTROM Jared D V V V V V V D 2.9 5 +2.1
36 ATEFI Daniel V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
37 CARLISLE Austin M. V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
38 MORRIS Samuel A. D V V V V V V D 3.7 5 +1.3
39 UEYAMA Ietetsu A. V V V D V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
40 TRAVERS Samir T. D V D V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
40 BERGER Oliver V V V V D D V D 4.8 4 -0.8
42 LASORSA Matthew V V V V D D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
43 CHEONG Heonjae D D V V V V V D 4.3 4 -0.3
44 BUERGENTHAL Aaron P. D D V V V V V D 5.2 4 -1.2
45 FRANKEL Yitzchok A. V V D V V D V D 3.9 4 +0.1
45 KEEFE Duncan V V V V D D V D 2.9 4 +1.1
48 LUKASHENKO Darii V D V V D V V D 5.1 4 -1.1
49 MORRILL Justin V D V V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
49 XU William V V D D V V V D 2.5 4 +1.5
51 CHIN Matthew W. V V V D D V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
52 TANN Justin V V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
53 CHEN Leo V V D V D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
54 DU Gavin J. D D V V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
55 RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. D D V V D V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
56 HOUTZ Jackson V V D D D V V D 2.4 3 +0.6
57 SUBBIAH Prashanth V. D V V D V D V D 5.0 3 -2.0
57 LIU kelly D D V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
59 BARBER William S. D D D V V V V D 3.6 3 -0.6
60 KIM-COGAN Ryan V V D V D D V D 3.4 3 -0.4
61 BONSELL Vance V D V D D V V D 1.9 3 +1.1
62 LICHT Aaron H. V V V D D D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
63 RAJA Arnav D D D D V V V D 4.5 2 -2.5
64 LUCZKOW Arman D V D D V D V D 3.4 2 -1.4
65 PINTO Gabriel R. V D V V V D D 2.3 4 +1.7
66 TONG ZACHARY D D V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
67 GOLD Jackson D V D V D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
68 PETRAMALE Samuel J. D D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
69 PREJEAN Patrick J. V D V V D D D 3.5 3 -0.5
70 LEE Conner M. V V D D V D D 3.2 3 -0.2
71 CARTER Jackson D D V D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 OWENS Harrison J. D V V D D V D 3.2 3 -0.2
73 BERUBE Jesse L. D V D D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
74 ELIN Adam E. D V D D V D 0.9 2 +1.1
75 NARANJO David E. V V D D D D 1.8 2 +0.2
76 ZHOU Kevin D V D V D D D 3.4 2 -1.4
77 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. D V D D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
78 GHENEA George Philipe V V D D D D D 2.0 2 -
79 LI Joshua L. V D D V D D D 3.0 2 -1.0
80 SAMMI Mukund D V D D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
81 ZHOU Miles D D D V D V D 1.8 2 +0.2
82 BERMAN Luca D D V D V D D 4.5 2 -2.5
83 COX Luis E. D V D D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
84 ALKIN Isaac D D D V D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
85 ZHOU Aeres Z. D D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
85 HUANG Tyler T. D D V D D V D 2.2 2 -0.2
87 COLLINS Andrew M. D D V D D V D 1.5 2 +0.5
88 HONG Vincent Q. D V V D D D D 1.6 2 +0.4
89 PLAGA Quinn D D V V D D D 1.2 2 +0.8
90 LU Caleb Q. D D D D V V D 2.0 2 -
91 GARCIA Ryan D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
92 ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) D D D D V V D 1.6 2 +0.4
93 SMITH Vaughn D D V D D V D 0.6 2 +1.4
94 NEVILLE James V D V D D D D 0.6 2 +1.4
95 ROPER Evan C. V D D D D D 3.5 1 -2.5
96 PLONKA Derek V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
97 PEARSON James G. D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
98 DELARUE NELSON Y. V D D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
99 LU Jiayi (Charlie) D D V D D D D 3.1 1 -2.1
100 SWORDS Evan F. D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
101 BULL Anderson V D D D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
102 TREFNEY Albert D D D D V D D 2.0 1 -1.0
102 LU Evan D D D V D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
104 FOX Nicholas D D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
104 SHASHA zane D D D D V D D 1.7 1 -0.7
106 KARPINSKI Michael A. V D D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
107 RYAN Will D D D V D D D 1.0 1 -
108 TIERNO Thomas J. D D V D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
109 BURNS Jackson P. V D D D D D D 1.6 1 -0.6
109 WANG Andy D D D V D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
111 BIRKS Evan D. D V D D D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
114 ADHIKARI Anubhav D D V D D D D 2.1 1 -1.1
115 TIMMINS Daniel R. D D V D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
116 WONG Ethan D D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
117 LEUNG Nathan D D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
118 STEVENS Jeffrey D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
119 EPSTEIN Oliver D. D D D D D D D 2.1 0 -2.1
119 NIELANDER Elliot S. D D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
121 HODGES Calvin D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
122 HAYES Tyler D D D D D D D 0.2 0 -0.2
123 COOK Aidan J. D D D D D D D 0.4 0 -0.4

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.