Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Joy | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 2 | MAK Jayden | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
| 3 | JOHN Sophia | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | CHOWDHERY Myra | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 23% |
| 5 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
| 6 | ZHAO Selena | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 7 | MALUKI Nia | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 8 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG Ashley | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
| 10 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | YOUNG Sienna | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 12 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 15 | LIAO Amber | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | PEREIRA Izumi | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHEN Chloe | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 27% | 3% |
| 18 | PATEL Maia | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 19 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 20 | ONO Lisa | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 21 | ALPEROVICH Madeline | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | AVATAPALLI Sri Aadya | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WANG Keira | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 24 | PASSMAN Caroline | 7% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 25 | FREY Elise | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WILLER Anna | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 4% |
| 27 | LAU Angela | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 28 | YAP Anna | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | KETT alexis | 14% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KONDE Anika | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHTEYMAN Simone | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 32 | MUNSHI Ridhima | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | |
| 33 | ARORA Rhiya | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | LIU Alyssa | 1% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 35 | PALACIOS Sophia | - | 1% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 36 | AN Jasmine | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | POTDAR Harper | 35% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CHANG Daisy | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | MADDISON Estelle | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 17% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WU Jing | 15% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.