Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GONG Joy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% |
| 2 | MAK Jayden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 17% | |
| 3 | JOHN Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% |
| 3 | CHOWDHERY Myra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
| 5 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 6 | ZHAO Selena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% |
| 7 | MALUKI Nia | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 8 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 9 | ZHANG Ashley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
| 10 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | YOUNG Sienna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | KABILING Anika Von Marie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 65% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | CANARAN Daphne M. | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 14 | CONVERSO-PARSONS Maia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 15 | LIAO Amber | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | PEREIRA Izumi | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHEN Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 29% | 3% |
| 18 | PATEL Maia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 4% |
| 19 | TSIPORUKHA Arie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | ONO Lisa | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | ALPEROVICH Madeline | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
| 22 | AVATAPALLI Sri Aadya | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 23 | WANG Keira | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
| 24 | PASSMAN Caroline | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | FREY Elise | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 26 | WILLER Anna | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 27 | LAU Angela | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 28 | YAP Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | KETT alexis | 100% | 86% | 53% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KONDE Anika | 100% | 96% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | SHTEYMAN Simone | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 32 | MUNSHI Ridhima | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 33 | ARORA Rhiya | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | LIU Alyssa | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | PALACIOS Sophia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 80% | 40% | 9% | - |
| 36 | AN Jasmine | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | POTDAR Harper | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 38 | CHANG Daisy | 100% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 39 | MADDISON Estelle | 100% | 81% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | SAXENA Devina Shyamli | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | WU Jing | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.