The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | BERMENDER Cameron | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 53% |
2 | OH Samuel H. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
3 | FERNANDES Zain | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% |
3 | LAO Scott E. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
5 | LI Raphael C. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
6 | CHOI Ethan L. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% |
7 | CARTER Lucas M. | - | 7% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 2% |
8 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 11% | 37% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
9 | SOHN Christopher | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 42% |
10 | SHERMAN Marco J. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% |
11 | OTAKE Jared K. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
12 | LOMBARDI Leo | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
13 | SCHUR Skyler | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
14 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 38% | 7% |
15 | KO Tyler B. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
16 | DAVIS Christopher M. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
17 | TSANG Matthew K. | - | 8% | 36% | 40% | 15% | 1% |
18 | MAO Connor | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
19 | CHOI Samuel | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
20 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 7% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% |
21 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
22 | HSIUNG Richie | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
23 | NGUYEN Kevin | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
24 | OCKENFUSS Jeremiah J. | 6% | 41% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
25 | WESTELIUS Isak R. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
26 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 45% | 49% | 6% | - | - | - |
26 | LIM Charles Q. | 16% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - |
28 | VINOD Konark | 24% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
28 | MARSHALL Wyeth | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
30 | LIZARRAGA Sebastian | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.