Rockland Community College - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CAO Amelie | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
2 | ROBERTS Anastasia | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 66% | |
3 | LIU Caydence | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% | |
3 | KRAHE Annika | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 56% |
5 | MCFARLANE Asha | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 69% |
6 | BAULIN Zoya | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
7 | ZHU Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% |
8 | JOO Sara | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 13% | |
9 | WAN Celine | 1% | 8% | 30% | 41% | 18% | 2% | < 1% |
10 | SHIN Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 40% | 27% |
11 | SHUTZER Lily | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% | |
12 | EPSTEIN Naomi | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
13 | LI Christina | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 9% | |
14 | DINAR Julia | - | 2% | 11% | 35% | 44% | 8% | |
15 | MURPHY Genevieve | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 3% |
16 | PELLE Lia | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 1% | |
17 | LIN Yunong | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
18 | CASCONE Sophie | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
19 | MACKINTOSH Quinn | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
20 | MANGLANI Maya | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
21 | DE CASTRO Kai | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
22 | LOPES Julia | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
23 | CHOI Cara | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
24 | YOUM Amelia | 1% | 7% | 24% | 39% | 24% | 5% | - |
25 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
26 | HOU Xu | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
27 | PRINZ-STRATEMAN Matilda | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
28 | CHAN Kaitlyn | 6% | 36% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | |
29 | LIN Zhishan | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
30 | GOODMAN Carden | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
31 | ZHANG Caroline | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
32 | GENG Emma | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
33 | YARBILOVA Fasikhat | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
34 | PAEK Mila | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
35 | PEVZNER Sophia | 1% | 12% | 35% | 37% | 14% | 2% | |
36 | HEMPHILL Mia | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
37 | COLE Sofia | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
38 | MULLER Amara | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 2% |
39 | GOMEZ Sofia | 14% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
40 | KANDALAFT Emma | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | STEWART Isla | 15% | 39% | 33% | 12% | 1% | - | |
42 | BRADSHAW Tamira | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
43 | BALIN Sophia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | - |
44 | FAN Melody | 6% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
45 | BEKIYANTS Elizabeth | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
46 | HUDSON Patterson | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
47 | KOESTERS Cecilie | 19% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
48 | BENTLEY Amelia | 27% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
49 | PIERSIG Eleanor | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | - | |
50 | LEVY Zia | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
51 | JUVVADI Aanika | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
52 | LIANG Jasmine | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | LENZ Phoebe | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | - | - | |
54 | KOESTERS Florentine | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
55 | PLAZA Sofia | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
56 | GUSTAFSSON Anna | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
57 | ALDREDGE Ginny Rebecca | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
58 | DIETIKER Claire | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
59 | PARK Addison | 1% | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
60 | STEELE Veronica | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.